China’s arbitrary imprisonment of top business leaders is a self-defeating weakness that can be exploited by the United States and our allies globally.
China’s Chip Slip
On March 23, Beijing released Chen Datong, a leading computer chip investor who spent eight months in detention just as China sought to sanction-proof its tech industry with domestically-manufactured semiconductors.Chen’s $1.5 billion company, Hua Capital, has invested in over 150 semiconductor companies in China. It was “at the forefront of Beijing’s efforts to jump-start its domestic chip production,” according to the Financial Times.
Hua was among the many recipients of $47 billion in subsidies from the Chinese regime to end reliance on foreign chip design and fab facilities. However, the massive seed funding failed to yield any major breakthroughs.
Brain Drain From Russia
Also that week, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s ally, Dmitry Medvedev, “threatened to arrest Russian weapons producers if they didn’t work faster,” according to The Wall Street Journal.It wouldn’t be the first time that executives were arrested in Russia.
In an interview with Khodorkovsky last month, he noted that sanctions on Russia have an effect long term, but targeting Russia’s skilled labor force would yield yet higher returns.
“Western countries could recruit Russian engineers, for example, and make it very easy for them to immigrate,” he said. “The loss of such people is much more painful for Putin than economic sanctions.” These skilled workers would then assist the West, noted Khodorkovsky.
Venezuela: Suing for Compensation
Venezuela, part of a group of rogue nations that have turned toward Beijing and Moscow after suffering sanctions by the United States and European Union, also arrests corporate executives in a manner that decreases business confidence in the country.Eastern Versus Western Strategy
The strategy of threatening and imprisoning business leaders will drive local businesses, and other businesses internationally, to capital flight from Venezuela, China, and Russia, and investment in the United States, Europe, Japan, and other leading democratic societies with rule of law that respects market principles and the freedom of the individual.The East, Russia included, and its allies like Venezuela and Iran, are clearly following a self-destructive strategy with respect to business, which drives investment abroad. Democracies and markets appear to have a kinship that authoritarian countries less frequently enjoy.
This relationship of democracy to markets arguably extends back to the shift from a medieval economy prior to the 14th century to a capitalist economy in the 15th century and after. The preference of businesses for market democracies in part explains the growth of democracy since.
Contemporary democracies can still take advantage of the dynamic when seeking to weaken the world’s most dangerous dictators and their satraps in North Korea, Iran, Syria, Burma (Myanmar), and Venezuela.
A full-court press by democratic diplomats to encourage brain drain and capital flight from China and Russia, democracies’ chief global adversaries, through attractive investment conditions in democratic countries is a winning low-risk strategy.
But the strategy may not work forever, at which point businesses could migrate back to China and its allies.
According to an official in Beijing who discussed the situation of Chen, for example, “The dire situation of the U.S.-China technology war has forced Beijing to decide to release him as soon as possible.”