The U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy to counter the Chinese regime is making progress, with alliances building and expanding. However, there is still work to be done as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to vie for influence and control in the region.
The Indo-Pacific, which spans from the U.S. Pacific coastline to the Indian Ocean, is the focal point of intense competition between the United States and China. Currently, the United States holds dominance in this area, which is home to over half the world’s population, nearly two-thirds of global gross domestic product, and seven of the world’s largest militaries, according to the White House. Consequently, the region hosts the highest concentration of U.S. military personnel and bases outside the United States.
The IPS document states, “From the economic coercion of Australia to the conflict along the Line of Actual Control with India to the growing pressure on Taiwan and bullying of neighbors in the East and South China Seas, our allies and partners in the region bear much of the cost of the PRC’s harmful behavior.”
PRC refers to communist China’s official name, the People’s Republic of China.
The IPS states that from the end of World War II to the collapse of the USSR, the United States was focused on the Cold War with Russia. Now, geopolitical realities have shifted U.S. priorities to countering the Chinese regime in the Indo-Pacific.
The IPS was designed to foster collaboration with allies, partners, and institutions within and beyond the region to boost prosperity and maintain stability. It underscores Washington’s commitment to maintaining a rules-based international order and countering the CCP’s rising influence. The strategy aims to achieve this through enhanced military capabilities, robust alliances, and economic initiatives.
The CCP exerts its influence through economic investments and military actions, such as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and aggressive actions in the South China Sea. Additionally, Beijing seeks to find Indo-Pacific nations willing to sign security agreements and host Chinese military bases. Japan, a major economic power, plays a crucial role in multilateral frameworks and often acts as a more neutral proxy for U.S. interests, making other Asian countries feel less threatened and more comfortable aligning with regional policies.
Similarly, an “AUKUS Plus” could potentially include countries like India, Japan, and South Korea, broadening the alliance’s scope to comprehensively address regional security and technological challenges.
The Chinese regime’s increased aggression has driven India closer to the United States in terms of security engagement, as evidenced by New Delhi’s growing defense ties with Washington.
It should be said that despite numerous setbacks, the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy has made significant strides in strengthening alliances and promoting multilateral cooperation. The Indo-Pacific remains free, with the United States holding a dominant position, but the threat from the CCP continues.
To counter Beijing’s BRI, the United States will need to increase its investment and economic engagement through the IPEF. At the same time, the Chinese regime’s increased aggression is inadvertently driving countries closer to the United States, serving American interests in the region.