Chinese Law Firms Going Abroad to Align With China’s Foreign Policy

Chinese Law Firms Going Abroad to Align With China’s Foreign Policy
Pedestrians cross a road in front of buildings in the central business district in Beijing, China, on Nov. 23, 2021. China's marked economic slowdown in the second half of the year is testing the central bank's policy mettle and dividing economists over whether more aggressive action is needed to avoid a deeper downturn. Qilai Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Mary Hong
Updated:
0:00
Commentary

Top-tier Chinese law firms are accelerating their overseas expansion efforts along with China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) amid a slowing economy.

Beijing-based Jingsh Law Firm announced its plan in November 2023 to establish three offices in North Korea, South Korea, and Tokyo, Japan, in an effort to build a formidable platform facilitating the expansion of Chinese enterprises in response to the deceleration of the Chinese economy, according to a Nikkei report.

At least eight of the largest Chinese law firms have opened offices in Asia and the United States since the start of 2023, with more planned, reported the Financial Times.

In January this year, the Chinese Ministry of Justice revealed that the number of foreign-related lawyers has exceeded 12,000. The number of overseas branches of Chinese law firms increased from 122 in 2018 to 180 in 2022. As of November 2023, the number of foreign-related lawyers in China has increased by over 4,800 compared to 2018, representing a growth rate of 67.8 percent.

Yu Ping, a Chinese legal scholar, said that Chinese law firms and lawyers are “highly market-oriented, making it unlikely for their profit structure and business logic to align closely with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).”

“In fact, Chinese lawyers may even be viewed as adversaries of the CCP,” Mr. Yu told the Chinese-language edition of The Epoch Times.

Aligning With BRI

Mr. Gao (pseudonym), a lawyer based in Japan, said that Chinese law firms’ overseas expansion appears to align with serving the regime’s strategy for global expansion.

Mr. Gao told The Epoch Times that Chinese investors venturing abroad often face language barriers when seeking legal assistance. “They naturally seek out Chinese lawyers who possess expertise in foreign laws,” he said.

“When the Chinese companies invest in Japan, they may feel more assured going through me to find a Japanese law firm. This creates motivation for the Chinese law firms to expand overseas.”

Mr. Yu agreed, “The Chinese state-owned enterprises will prefer to use Chinese law firms. They prefer not to reveal their investment information to foreign law firms, although international law firms will maintain confidentiality. But, they always have concerns.”

Based on official statistics released by the Chinese Ministry of Commerce and other departments, China’s outbound investment has been surging in recent years. In particular, China’s 70+ BRI participating states represented tremendous opportunities for Chinese investors, according to the China Briefing.

In the first eight months of 2023, China’s non-financial outbound direct investments (ODI) in BRI countries totaled 140.37 billion yuan ($19.20 billion), marking a significant 22.5 percent increase year-on-year.

According to figures from China’s National Bureau of Statistics, outbound direct investment decreased 8.8 percent in 2022 compared to the previous year. Despite this overall decrease, investments in Asia (excluding Hong Kong) remained steady at $26.7 billion, matching the previous year’s level.

Mr. Yu said that investing in markets that are friendly to China is a common practice. Such investments offer an avenue to exert political influence without encountering stringent legal hurdles. These countries often give the green light as well. “Of course, it’s more convenient to operate this way, which is also a consistent practice of the CCP,” said Mr. Yu.

CCP’s Legal Warfare

Since joining the WTO in 2001, Beijing has experienced a period of integration with the world, demonstrating a willingness to adopt Western legal concepts. Chinese law firms had more opportunities to engage in international business. However, foreign law firms with centuries of experience were still the preferred choice for enterprises.

Thereafter, the CCP began to exert increased control over various aspects of the legal system.

Since 2012, lawyers have been mandated to pledge allegiance to the CCP during their oaths.
In January 2017, Chief Justice Zhou, the head of the Chinese Supreme People’s Court, asserted that judicial independence was an “erroneous influence from the West.”

In September 2023, the CCP mouthpiece Liberation Daily reported that Shanghai is actively developing the Asia-Pacific Arbitration Center and the Shanghai International Legal Service Center with a global orientation.

According to the report, the Shanghai Bar Association initiated a long-term training program for foreign-related lawyers known as the “Navigation Plan,” which has successfully trained 302 lawyers proficient in international business, regulations, and cross-lingual, cross-cultural skills. The number of practicing lawyers engaged in foreign legal services in Shanghai has now reached nearly 3,500, representing 10 percent of the city’s total lawyers.

The regime’s mouthpiece, Xinhua News, had also reported earlier in 2019 that the Shanghai Jin Mao Partners established partnerships with law firms from G20 member countries, Shanghai Cooperation Organization member countries, and BRICS countries. Its BRI Legal Research and Service Center has developed 68 offices across five continents in three years.

“Upon the inception of the BRI, the legal sector promptly engaged,” said Mr. Yu.

According to Mr. Yu, the China Law Society and the China Bar Association took the lead, primarily aiming to support governmental policies.

Legal expert Tan Yao-Nan told The Epoch Times that the core distinction between the legal industry in China and their Western counterparts lies in their relationship with the government.

He said, “In China, there are laws enabling the regime to legally mandate businesses, including foreign companies, to comply with national policy directions. Do these laws extend to law firms? If so, does it conflict with the industry’s inherent commitment to client confidentiality? As a burgeoning industry in China’s expanding landscape, Chinese law firms should address this matter to the public. However, I haven’t come across any such clarifications from them.”

Party Adversaries

Mr. Yu said Chinese law firms and lawyers are deeply entrenched in a market-driven environment characterized by profit motives and business strategies that inherently keep them away from the CCP.

He explained, “If you examine the inner workings of Chinese law firms, you'll realize that they lack the capability and financial resources to undertake government-sponsored ideological endeavors abroad. Survival is their primary concern, as their revenue stream depends on clients, primarily centered around compliance work.”

He indicated that state-owned law firms only existed in the 1980s. Today, China’s leading law firms are all private partnerships that do not receive government funding.

“Law firms operate differently from state-owned institutions as they lack centralized leadership. They are essentially packs of individual entities, resembling a sack of potatoes that appear as one unit when together but separate into individual entities when dispersed. Business decisions in law firms are determined through partner meetings, and what guides these decisions? They are driven by interests,” he said.

He doesn’t believe there is hard evidence suggesting that lawyers are forced to participate in the BRI due to pressure from authorities. He said, “Many partners in prominent law firms opt not to participate in the initiative. They prioritize compliance-related business, which often yields higher profits.”

He emphasized, “Indeed if we look closely, lawyers should be considered CCP’s adversaries.”

“They do not work to serve the Party’s interests. In China, lawyers are among the most resistant to Party leadership. Consequently, CCP views law firms as a weak link and has consistently sought to suppress and control them over the years,” he said.

Mr. Yu took the 709 Crackdown in 2015 as an example. In July 2015, the regime conducted a nationwide crackdown on rights lawyers and activists in China. “Hundreds of them were arrested, along with their families,” he said.

Hong Kong Democratic Party's Albert Ho (C) wears mock handcuffs as he attends a protest after at least 50 Chinese human rights lawyers and activists were detained or questioned in recent days in an "unprecedented" police swoop. In Hong Kong on July 12, 2015. (Anthony Wallace/AFP/Getty Images)
Hong Kong Democratic Party's Albert Ho (C) wears mock handcuffs as he attends a protest after at least 50 Chinese human rights lawyers and activists were detained or questioned in recent days in an "unprecedented" police swoop. In Hong Kong on July 12, 2015. Anthony Wallace/AFP/Getty Images

Furthermore, lawyers face immense pressure when representing private enterprises. “Despite this, they have no alternative; their livelihood depends on these cases, and they must handle them because they are being paid for it,” said Mr. Yu.

Song Tang, Yi Ru, and Jiang Zuoyi contributed to this report.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Mary Hong
Mary Hong
Author
Mary Hong is a NTD reporter based in Taiwan. She covers China news, U.S.-China relations, and human rights issues. Mary primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus."
Related Topics