How much is it worth to do business in China? That’s a question that every company and government will have to answer very soon.
On Dec. 1, a new and comprehensive law in China, the Cybersecurity Multi-level Protection Scheme (“MLPS 2.0”), will come into effect. This new cybersecurity law has absolutely nothing to do with securing data, intellectual property or servers, but rather, the complete opposite.
Time to Rethink Operating in China
This new law should make companies doing business in China rethink every aspect of their supply-chain strategy.Every person and company in China will have to comply with this new policy. Any and all platforms, apps, or other technology that could prevent access by the Ministry of Public Security will be outlawed. That means companies and individuals in China must abandon typical security protocols and technologies, such as VPN, encryption, and using private servers.
ISPs, Telephone Companies Are Spy Vectors
But the transparency doesn’t just rely on individual’s and companies’ compliance to being “transparent.” The Ministry of Public Security can—and will—require full access, via back doors or other data capture techniques to be installed by China Telecom and all China ISPs, with no exceptions. The MLPS 2.0 law is comprehensively intrusive, utterly totalitarian, and perfectly Orwellian, but with “Chinese characteristics” of course. It is specifically designed to fulfill two purposes:- To block any outlawed or otherwise unapproved content and communication from either internal or external sources on China’s internet platform;
- Allow complete transparency and access of all data, intellectual property, trade secrets, etc. by China’s Ministry of Public Security and other government security organs as well as those within the CCP.
- GB/T 22239—2019 Information Security Technology—Baseline for Multi-level Protection Scheme;
- GB/T 25070—2019 Information Security Technology—Technical Requirements of Security Design for Multi-level Protection Scheme;
- GB/T 28448—2019 Information Security Technology—Evaluation Requirements for Multi-level Protection Scheme.
CCP Will Be in Control
This new system subjects all foreigners, not just Chinese citizens, to China’s “Big Brother” surveillance state. What’s more, the Ministry of Public Security is now a top-tier agency under the CCP’s control, superseding the prior authority of other Chinese agencies responsible for cybersecurity, such as MIIT (China Telecom), CAC, CNNIC, and others. That has additional ominous implications.No Such Thing as ‘Confidentiality’
Even though the confidentiality of data is actually “guaranteed” in Article 5 of the Regulation on Internet Security Supervision and Inspection by Public Security Organs, it’s not really protected. That’s because the definition of “strictly kept confidential and shall not be disclosed, sold or illegally provided for others” is language that is in no way comprehensive in its meaning or application.For example, nothing in China is confidential to the CCP; it has absolute authority over everything. The CCP will therefore have every right to access, record and even remove data from your phone, company server, email or other channel as it sees fit. What’s more, it will have the right to share the data with CCP-owned companies, or other entities under the authority of the CCP.
Sinister Threat to Everyone
Needless to say, the long-term implications of this new law coming into force are far-reaching and even sinister. It would appear to be a domestic version of Huawei’s spyware abroad, leading to a deepening of control of all companies in China, by the CCP and the government. Indeed, CCP officials are now present in most if not all of China’s biggest companies, even the nominally non state-owned ones such as Tencent and Alibaba.The law may be a response to the escalating trade war with the United States and the fact that China has been called out on its widespread habit of technology theft that the trade war threatens. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter. The key point is that operating in China will soon present an economic as well as a strategic threat to the United States and other nations around the world.
Who can afford that?