If you’re confused about President Joe Biden’s various student loan debt-cancellation schemes, who can blame you? And on Tuesday, the Biden administration unveiled its third attempt to make you pay for someone else’s life choices.
First, some background.
But, as President Biden recently said, the Supreme Court may have blocked him, but didn’t stop him from skirting the law and violating the separation of powers in new ways.
For example, a four-person household earning $67,500, close to the median income in the United States, would have a monthly loan payment of $0 and eventually qualify for full cancellation. In addition, despite making lower monthly payments, borrowers could qualify for loan cancellation in as little as 10 years, instead of 20 or more, depending on their loan amounts.
• Borrowers experiencing “hardship” in paying back their loans. The term “hardship” remains ambiguous, granting the secretary of education extensive authority to determine its definition and, thereby, eligibility for relief.
• Borrowers who initiated their loan payments before 2005 for undergraduate loans or before 2000 for some graduate loans. For this group, there is potential for complete debt cancellation. Many of these borrowers are now 20 or more years into their careers and most likely earning far more than they did right out of college.
• Borrowers who owe more on their loans now due to accrued interest than when they initially began repayment. The department suggests canceling up to $20,000 of accrued interest for all borrowers and canceling the entire accumulated interest for a certain group of borrowers.
• Borrowers who meet the existing loan-cancellation program criteria, but have yet to submit an application.
• Borrowers who enrolled in a degree program and later lost eligibility for federal funding due to poor performance or fraud are affected. This provision primarily affects borrowers who attended for-profit colleges.
This plan has been in the works for months, as the department has been undergoing negotiated rulemaking, as required by the Higher Education Act, when developing new regulations under Title IV of the law.
Under Biden’s proposed rule, many people who have no financial hardship at all, but who delayed payments for some reason, would see their interest canceled.
Even if the scheme were lawful—which it isn’t—it would be badly targeted. Also, the 30-day comment period is too short yet again. Such short comment periods for such large plans—this one is a 279-pager—have been the basis of litigation, such as in the SAVE litigation.
It’s also important to remember that student loan debt doesn’t simply disappear just because it’s “forgiven” by the Biden administration, lawfully or unlawfully. Cancellation is simply a debt transfer from the individual borrower who benefited from attending college to all American taxpayers—the majority of whom did not.
Whether Plans B and C succeed or fail in court, all of these efforts fail to address the more pressing issue of higher education affordability.
Subsidizing student debt and then canceling it does nothing to address the escalating cost of college, but instead adds to the debt burden of the American taxpayers for generations to come and encourages colleges to raise prices even more.