Be Careful Where You Buy Your Tech From

Be Careful Where You Buy Your Tech From
The RCMP logo is seen outside the RCMP "E" Division Headquarters, in Surrey, B.C., in a file photo. Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press
Phil Gurski
Updated:
0:00
Commentary

Normally, the word “phoenix” conjures up an image of a proud bird from Egyptian mythology which at the end of its life bursts into flames before giving way to the next generation. Or, if you are much younger or not into 2,000-year-old stories, you may think of the second Harry Potter film. Tomato, tomahto.

If you are Canadian, however, you are more likely to conjure up the Phoenix pay fiasco which has been bedeviling the government for over a decade. Apparently the decision to bring in this software, developed by a private firm with the promise to save the government millions, actually produced outstanding pay issues totalling $520 million, affecting 150,000 public servants, in the first year and a half of its deployment alone.

So you would conclude that the government would be extra careful in adopting other products, especially those which have implications for national security. But you would be wrong.

The RCMP signed a contract with Ontario-based Sinclair Technologies, which is ultimately controlled by the Chinese telecommunications giant Hytera, to supply radio frequency filters, onsite maintenance, and engineering support. The deal was not that big, slightly over $500,000, but the government nonetheless suspended it, apparently at the behest of Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino.

What to make of this? Several things. First and foremost, and most worryingly, it is all but incomprehensible that our government, or any agency thereof, would still deal with the People’s Republic of China in light of our recent history with that nation. Whether it is foreign interference—the harassment of Uyghurs, Tibetans, dissidents, Falun Gong adherents, and others in Canada—or other mucking about in our land, the PRC is not Canada’s friend. Secondly, our national police force should not be entrusting any part of its communications system, no matter how minor or peripheral, to a non-ally, especially when there are other providers more trustworthy.

Then again, given that the government took years to definitively rule out Huawei in the development of our 5G system, despite our allies having done so much earlier, this is not surprising. Federal governments of both political stripes have performed woefully on national security grounds for many, many years, due to a lack of interest in the matter and the absence of a mature intelligence culture that recognizes the importance of sensitive material to help decision-makers.

Canada’s foot-dragging on the Huawei issue most likely didn’t go unnoticed by our allies, especially the so-called Five Eyes (an intelligence-sharing club that also includes Australia, New Zealand, the UK, and United States), and could very well have led to doubts over what to share with us (we are a net recipient of intelligence and cannot afford to have our partners turn off the taps).

Is there a lesson here? Of course there is, several in fact. China is not our friend. The PRC should not be allowed to participate in any part of our economy that relates to national security. Canadian governments really need to take these matters more seriously. Intelligence agencies need to have a prominent place at the table when these things come up and their advice needs to be taken seriously (in this case, the Communications Security Establishment must be a key player). I could go on...

The legendary phoenix always sprang back from annihilation. Government systems do not have that luxury.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Phil Gurski
Phil Gurski
Author
Phil Gurski spent 32 years working at Canadian intelligence agencies and is a specialist in terrorism. He is the author of six books on terrorism.
Related Topics