The former type helped reelect Donald Trump, who now has a double mandate to finally secure U.S. borders. Leaving the borders porous allowed massive groups of immigrants to wade across the Rio Grande and through holes in razor-wire fences. An occasional helping hand from border patrol officers was outrageous and dangerous both for encouraging illegal immigration and from the perspective of assisting the entry of criminals and spies into the country.
Already, Canada and Mexico are increasing border enforcement to save themselves from higher U.S. tariffs after Jan. 20. Trump is getting action from Mexico City and Ottawa by pressuring them with America’s most powerful bargaining chip: access to U.S. markets. And Trump has big plans to corral illegals and send them back home. That will decrease the number of workers available to U.S. homes and businesses but deter further illegal immigration.
More effective border enforcement will help the U.S. government tailor immigration to the right kinds of immigrants that we need while keeping out criminals. The right kind of immigrants are those who make America stronger, as they have for centuries.
Musk founded SpaceX. He was an early investor in Tesla and eventually became its CEO. Now, his companies employ over 100,000 Americans.
America is arguably stronger because of the industries that Ramaswamy and Musk started. Had the United States denied them access, they would have gone elsewhere and could have established companies that develop technologies that help China or Russia more than the United States. America would have fewer jobs.
This is not to say that every immigrant should be a Musk or Ramaswamy or that we should be careless in our immigration policies. The success of many U.S. businesses and the jobs they provide are based on proprietary technologies that, if lost to an adversary country, could be used against the United States. So we should be careful that H-1B visas, for example, add to U.S. technology without siphoning it back to places like Russia and China.
Many H-1B visa holders are from China, the second-largest country of origin for U.S. immigrants after Mexico. Many Chinese immigrants reject the regime in Beijing and strive to move themselves, their families, and their investments permanently to the United States, thus strengthening the U.S. economy and technological ecosystem.
Some Chinese immigrants, however, continue to support the Chinese Communist Party after they move to the United States and, therefore, should know better. They could return to China with the scientific and technological knowledge they gathered in the United States. Some have engaged in industrial or commercial espionage within U.S. industry, national laboratories, and academia.
U.S. labs, companies, and universities should obviously not rely on anyone who will likely leave for unfriendly countries with our most sensitive technologies. Instead, we should invest more in educating those U.S. citizens who are most loyal to America, in our science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) disciplines. Costs for this new approach could be covered by government subsidies.
The third-largest group of immigrants in the United States is from India. India is a democracy, which makes it far less of a threat than communist China. It is not an adversary country like Iran or North Korea. But India is more friendly with China and Russia than it should be. Any U.S. technology lost to India could be sold on to U.S. adversaries in the future.
There are numerous ways that critical U.S. technologies can leak and thereafter be used to weaken the United States. The wrong kind of immigrants is one such vector, but not the only one. All technology leaks to China, Russia, and other adversary countries must be prioritized and stopped if we are to maximize the defense of American freedoms. Meanwhile, our immigration policies should welcome the right kind of immigrants: those who deprive our adversaries of their ingenuity, strengthen America, and are loyal to American values.