A former elementary teacher has filed her second lawsuit against the Waterloo Region District School Board (WRDSB)—this time to overturn a decision that stopped her from questioning the age-appropriateness of sexual content in children’s books allowed in her school’s library.
“Parents have a right to know what is happening in their children’s schools and to voice their concerns. Boards must respect the rights of parents and teachers to free expression,” she said.
https://twitter.com/carolynburjoski/status/1538882666736517124?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1538882666736517124%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftnc.news%2F2022%2F06%2F21%2Fwaterloo-second-lawsuit%2F
The retired teacher said she was registered as a delegation to the Board of Trustees meeting at the time and was allotted 10 minutes to speak.
“During my presentation, I read excerpts from two children’s books available in our elementary school libraries, and I criticized the age-appropriateness of the sexual content,” she said.
One of the books was “Rick” by Alex Gina, in which the main character, a young boy named Rick, questions his sexuality because he doesn’t think about naked girls like his friends do. He later declares an asexual identity after joining the school’s rainbow club.
The second book was “The Other Boy” by M.G. Hennessy, in which the female character identifies as a boy and takes puberty blockers and testosterone as part of her medical sex transition.
Based on ‘False Claim’
While the WRDSB usually publishes video recordings of its meetings on YouTube, it didn’t post the recording of the Jan. 17 meeting. In a statement issued on Jan. 20, the board reiterated Piatkowski’s claims that there are concerns about potential violations of the Human Rights Code.The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), which is handling Burjoski’s case pro-bono, says the board’s decision is based on the “false claim” that she violated the Human Rights Code, and demonstrates “a serious lack of understanding and respect for basic democratic principles“ and ”cannot go unchallenged.”
“Justice Centre lawyers will argue in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice that the decision to muzzle Ms. Burjoski was a violation of her Charter right to freedom of expression,” the statement added.
Defamation Lawsuit
Burjoski’s first legal action against the WRDSB was launched on May 4 when she filed a defamation suit against the board and Piatkowski after he gave interviews to multiple media outlets, claiming that her comments during the meeting were “transphobic.”She added that the day after the meeting, she was told by human resources that she was “assigned to home” and prohibited from speaking to her students and colleagues while pending a formal disciplinary investigation.
Burjoski, who retired on Jan. 31, said investigators summoned her for questioning five days before her retirement, where she said she was required to sign a “gag order.”
‘Bullies’
In her latest video, Burjoski said one must stand up to “bullies.”“Years ago at a WRDSB anti-bullying workshop, I learned that victims and bystanders must stand together to confront bullies, or the bullies just get stronger,” she said.
“I am asking the court to overturn the board’s decision to stop my presentation because I did not violate the Ontario Human Rights Code,” she added.
“I am asking the court to order the board to allow me to return to the trustees meeting, where I hope to deliver my presentation in full.”
Burjoski said she hopes the judicial review will deter other school boards from engaging in similar practices against dissident voices.
“My goal is that this legal action sets a precedent that will dissuade school boards from attempting to use human rights codes to intimidate and silence voices that challenge their policies and ideology,” she said.