Ontario Provincial Police commissioner says the Freedom Convoy protest movement was identified as a “threat to national security” around Feb. 7, about a week after protesters had arrived in Ottawa and around the time protesters started blocking the Ambassador Bridge border crossing in Windsor, Ont.
OPP Commissioner Thomas Carrique’s comment was in response to a question by NDP MP Alistair MacGregor, who asked why protesters were allowed to set up in front of Parliament Hill since he said intelligence assessment from the federal Integrated Terrorism Assessment Centre (ITAC) released before the convoy arrived in Ottawa had said “extremists” were involved.
Carrique was testifying before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Safety on March 24.
It adds that “a coordinated, complex terrorist attack or planned storming Parliament or other federal locations is unlikely.” The report doesn’t clarify how the intelligence document was obtained.
Freedom Convoy organizers have maintained that their movement was peaceful, and have distanced themselves from some of the vocal protesters who have expressed extreme views.
Carrique said the protest movement was identified as a national security threat “through the provincial operational Intelligence Bureau on or about the 7th of February.”
Feb. 7 is the day the blockade of the Ambassador Bridge in Windsor started. Beforehand, the cross-country truck convoy had arrived in Ottawa on Jan. 28, and the Coutts border blockade started a few days after on Jan. 30.
The protest movement’s objective was to demand the lifting of COVID-19 mandates and restrictions. Government officials and several MPs have claimed that the protesters meant to overthrow the government, a charge Freedom Convoy protesters deny.
“I want to be very clear that our intent has always been, and always will be, to talk to the official government of Canada,” Freedom Convoy spokesperson Tom Marazzo said in Ottawa on Feb. 20. “I have stood at this podium, I have done other media events where I have outlined a plan, and I’ve said ‘I would like to talk to you.’”
During the protests, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau refused to talk to the protesters or send government representative to hear their grievances.
The federal government invoked the Emergencies Act on Feb. 14, after the Ambassador Bridge border crossing, which accounts for about US$360 million in trade daily, was cleared by police on Feb. 12 and the Coutts border-crossing in Alberta was cleared voluntarily.
By the time the government invoked the public emergency, the blockade at the Emerson border crossing in Manitoba was still in place, but it dispersed without police action on Feb. 16.
The measures provided by the Emergencies Act were only used to clear the protest in Ottawa.
Carrique told the committee the act was an “extremely valuable tool.”
Ottawa Police
Ottawa Police Service (OPS) interim chief Steve Bell also testified before the committee and related his organization’s involvement. He said that every year hundreds of protests take place in Ottawa, but this one was “unprecedented.”“The protesters brought thousands of vehicles to our city with the full intention of disrupting our capital.”
Bell also said the invoking of the Emergencies Act was a “critical piece” to clear the protest.
“Fears that there were weapons inside some of the trucks proved prescient: A police source said loaded shotguns were found,” says the Toronto Start article.
Bell told the committee that police didn’t lay any firearms-related charges, but said investigations are continuing in relation to “weapons possessions,” without elaborating the type of weapons that are being investigated and whether they include firearms.
Not satisfied with the answer, Lloyd repeatedly pressed for a “yes or no” answer.
“No, not to relating to any charges to this point,” Bell said.
Since the emergence of the convoy protests, sparked by the federal government’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for cross-border truck drivers, a number of claims have been made by opponents of the protest movement, including politicians, which have been contradicted by expert testimony or police investigation.