Sens. James Risch (R-Idaho) and John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) introduced a bill last week to stop the eco-terrorist tactic of tree spiking, after the nomination of Tracy Stone-Manning as director of the Bureau of Land Management.
The extent of Stone-Manning’s involvement in tree spiking, a form of eco-terrorism that involves driving spikes into trees to deter, injure, or kill loggers, remains a contentious topic.
She said that she had merely retyped and sent a written warning to the U.S. Forest Service from fellow activist John Blount about an act of tree spiking, after which she worked with her attorney to gain immunity for testifying in the trial of Blount and others.
“At the time, I believed that I was notifying the authorities by sending the letter,” Stone-Manning wrote.
As of press time, neither Manchin nor Sen. Jon Tester (R-Mont.) had responded to requests for comment on the new bill. Efforts to reach Stone-Manning were unsuccessful.
“The reality is she helped plan the tree spiking, covered up the terrorist activity for years. She did not cooperate with the authorities, she did not cooperate with investigators, and only testified after she was caught and received immunity.”
Risch also voiced his opposition to Stone-Manning’s nomination during the July 22 meeting.
“I’ve only been on this committee 13 years, but I’ve got to tell you, this is probably the most significant act of an insult to a really good agency and the people in that agency that I’ve ever seen perpetrated by this committee,” he said.
The American Loggers Council voted unanimously in opposition to Stone-Manning’s nomination.
On July 27, the full Senate voted 50–49 to discharge Stone-Manning’s nomination from the ENR committee, ensuring her nomination would move forward. Risch strenuously objected to the move, calling Stone-Manning “a perjurer, an eco-terrorist, a person who has participated in a conspiracy to murder innocent people working in the forest.”
“The term mitigate gives the agencies freedom to assess the situation and respond appropriately,” a spokesperson for Republicans on the ENR committee told The Epoch Times. “That could mean carefully removing spiked trees. It could mean removing the spikes, although this is very difficult. It could also mean mapping and posting warnings on each identified spiked tree.”
The spokesperson noted that it wasn’t clear when the Senate would consider the bill.
A spokesperson for Risch confirmed to The Epoch Times that the bill was inspired by Stone-Manning’s nomination.
“The lingering effects of the 1989 tree-spiking plot in the Clearwater National Forest were brought to light by Ms. Stone-Manning’s nomination,” the spokesperson wrote.
“It is our understanding that there are still spiked trees standing in the forest in Idaho today; however, there is no clear record of where these spiked trees are located, let alone any active program to remediate this safety hazard.
“Senator Risch asked the Chief of the Forest Service about this issue months ago and has yet to hear back. Any markings that may have once identified the spiked trees are long gone. As such, these trees continue to pose a threat to firefighters or smoke jumpers should they need to remove one during emergency operations. Moreover, it also presents a danger to loggers and sawmill workers should the area be harvested again someday.”
The nomination hasn’t yet been scheduled for a vote.