Department of Justice (DOJ) officials alerted states on July 28 that they’re closely tracking the 2020 election audit taking place in Arizona and proposed audits in several other states.
The laws cited by the DOJ include the Civil Rights Act of 1960, which mandates the retention of election records for 22 months after a federal election, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which outlines that no person “shall intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for voting or attempting to vote, or intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for urging or aiding any person to vote or attempt to vote.”
The former makes it the duty of election officials to maintain the security and integrity of the records and safeguard their chain of custody, “so that a complete and uncompromised record of federal elections can be reliably accessed and used in federal law enforcement matters,” the document states.
“Where election records leave the control of elections officials, the systems for maintaining the security, integrity, and chain of custody of those records can easily be broken. Moreover, where elections records are no longer under the control of elections officials, this can lead to a significant risk of the records being lost, stolen, altered, compromised, or destroyed. This risk is exacerbated if the election records are given to private actors who have neither experience nor expertise in handling such records and who are unfamiliar with the obligations imposed by federal law.”
The Republican-controlled Arizona Senate ordered an audit of the Nov. 3, 2020, election results in the state’s largest county, Maricopa County, tapping Florida-based Cyber Ninjas, which had no election audit experience, to perform the task.
Violators of the Civil Rights Act face fines of up to $1,000 and a jail sentence of up to one year for each violation.
“The reason we’re issuing this as guidance is to tell jurisdictions, generally, that we are concerned that if they’re going to conduct these audits, so-called audits of the past election, they have to comply with federal law, and warning them that they can’t conduct these audits in a way that is going to intimidate voters,” a DOJ official told reporters in a call about the guidance.
“This document sets down a marker that says the Justice Department is concerned about this, and we will be following this closely.”
Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, who ordered the audit, told The Epoch Times at the time, “Democrats have been trying every avenue they can to stop or discredit this audit.”
Fann wrote in a July 28 email that the DOJ guidance could serve as one of those avenues.
“I’m sure this will be one of many avenues they will pursue post-audit as well,” she said.
The Maricopa County effort is by far the largest post-election review in the nation. Auditors hand-tallied the ballots cast last year—nearly 2.1 million, according to county officials—and examined hundreds of machines used to count votes.
Auditors are expected to complete their physical work this week. A final report on what they found is expected to be released next month.
An initial plan to canvass households from which questionable votes were cast was put on hold after Pamela Karlan, a DOJ official, reached out to Fann to express concern about possible voter intimidation. Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan at a hearing this month recommended the canvass happen to clear up worries about some of the ballots auditors reviewed.
The Arizona audit has inspired lawmakers in other states. Pennsylvania Sen. Doug Mastriano, a Republican, recently initiated a review of the 2020 election in three counties after visiting the Maricopa County audit, though two of the counties have signaled that they won’t cooperate. Legislators and election integrity groups in Georgia and Wisconsin are pursuing similar efforts.
