Pay per Mile: States Move Toward User-Based Road Tax

Hybrid drivers pay twice

Traffic backs up at the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge toll plaza on Aug. 24, 2022. California announced a ban on the sale of new gasoline-powered cars after 2035 in a push to transition to electric vehicles, on Aug. 25, 2022. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

With each gallon of gasoline pumped in the United States since 1932, drivers have been paying taxes. The revenue is used for road repairs and public transportation such as train and bus systems.

Currently, the federal government takes 18.4 cents per gallon for gas or 24.4 cents per gallon for diesel. State gas taxes range from a national high of 61 cents per gallon for gas in Pennsylvania, to a low of 8.95 cents per gallon in Alaska.

But environmentally motivated improvements in fuel efficiency and the move to electric vehicles (EVs) translate to less gas sold, resulting in less tax revenue collected.

State and federal governments are looking for a new way to fund transportation. Through numerous studies by transportation organizations, they’ve landed on mileage-based user fees (MBUF); vehicle miles traveled fees; road user charges, or highway use fees (HUF). The acronyms all mean the same thing: Drivers pay a tax for each mile traveled.

“All vehicles are going farther on less gas, and that is great for our wallets, especially with the gas prices going up. But it’s not so good when our transportation system is dependent on that fuel tax,” Trish Hendren, executive director of the Eastern Transportation Coalition, told The Epoch Times. “The link between usage and payment is broken.”

The coalition describes itself as a partnership of 17 states and Washington, D.C. focused on connecting public agencies across modes of travel to increase safety and efficiency. Member states in the coalition include Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, and Virginia.

But the move to user-based fees is a nationwide effort being discussed in every state. Oregon, Utah, and Virginia have already implemented pilot programs.

At least 31 states have laws requiring a special registration fee for plug-in electric vehicles. Of those, 18 states also assess a fee on plug-in hybrid vehicles, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Fee for EV and Gas Power

Virginia implemented a new highway use fee for electric and high-efficiency gas vehicles in 2020, in addition to its existing vehicle license registration. The HUF is about $20 and is calculated based, in part, on a vehicle’s fuel efficiency.

In 2022, the state started offering Virginia’s Mileage Choice Program, a pilot program giving drivers paying the HUF the option to pay on a per-mile basis. They save money if they drive less than 11,600 miles, the average driven per year by all Virginians. Miles are recorded by a device installed on a person’s car and connected to a smartphone. Programs in Oregon and Utah are similar.

“The longer-term vision for a distance-based fee is it will replace the fuel tax,” Hendren said. But for now, those who drive high-efficiency gas vehicles often pay twice: both at the gas pump and with the HUF. In Virginia, drivers with fuel-efficient vehicles getting 25 miles per gallon or greater must pay the HUF.

In Utah, all plug-in hybrid and gas hybrid vehicles must pay the Road Usage Charge, ranging from $21.75 to $56.50. EV owners who don’t buy gas pay $130.25 per year.

In Oregon, the vehicle registration fee is based on fuel efficiency. The better the mileage (the less gas used), the higher the cost of registration. But those with high-efficiency vehicles can enroll in OreGO and get a registration discount. OreGO participants pay 1.9 cents for each mile driven, and the money goes to the state highway fund. A device on the vehicle tracks miles driven, and drivers of fuel-powered vehicles can receive a credit for fuel tax and remote emissions testing, the OreGO website states.

“This is a very challenging topic to talk about because nobody likes talking about paying for transportation,” Hendren said. “We all like the transportation that we use but paying for it is a hard conversation.”

Public Resistance

Studies recognize that drivers are concerned about privacy and a new tax, and offer analysis on what opposition a mileage fee would face.

“Consumer perception and messaging surrounding what many vehicle owners may see as a new ‘fee’ must also be studied before any largescale rollout of an MBUF program,” a 2019 study by the Mobility 21 U.S. DOT University National Transportation Center reads.

The study notes that there are privacy considerations and states that it’s an unsolved issue.

“In addition to the intricacies of program design, several technological challenges also exist,“ the study reads. ”For example, DOTs must collect mileage data from each vehicle, for each type of road that vehicle travels on, but would still require to do so in a manner that protects the privacy of drivers.”

Some studies attempted to minimize the privacy concern by showing other ways people are already being tracked.

“Even if you were tracking with GPS, my phone and other apps do that as well. I use E-Z Pass on toll roads and that tracks me,” a New Jersey focus group participant was quoted in a November 2022 report of the Georgia Joint Study Committee of Electrification on Transportation.

The number of people concerned about privacy dropped dramatically after participating in a pilot mileage program in Pennsylvania, Delaware, North Carolina, and New Jersey, a study of the Eastern Transportation Coalition found, according to Hendren.

Developers expect that a third party, not the government, will keep track of where drivers go and how much they owe, and some studies have indicated that because a third party is doing the tracking, the data are safe from government eyes. The data would go to a government contractor that would deduct the amount owed from a user’s credit card and pay it to the states where the vehicle had been.

Federal Directive to Increase Revenue

The 18.4-cent-per-gallon federal gas tax hasn’t increased since 1993. Because of inflation, the revenue has about one-third less purchasing power than it did when the tax was last raised, according to a January 2022 report from the federal Government Accountability Office.

In that report, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the increasing gap between projected fuel tax revenues and federal highway spending will require $191 billion in additional funding to maintain current spending levels, plus inflation from fiscal years 2022 through 2031.

In November 2021, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act allowed for the transfer of $118 billion in general revenue to the Highway Trust Fund, which will cover the estimated revenue shortfalls through at least 2026. While this funding will cover a portion of the estimated shortfall in the Highway Trust Fund, this transfer represents a one-time infusion of funding and isn’t a sustainable long-term source of revenues, according to the CBO report.

The CBO has been telling Congress since 2007 that it must pass a sustainable funding solution for maintaining the nation’s highways.

In 2015, the U.S. Department of Transportation established the Surface Transportation System Funding Alternatives program to provide grants to states to explore the feasibility of user-based alternative funding mechanisms. That’s what funded numerous studies across the country.

“The Federal Highway Administration is working diligently in response to Congress’s directive that we implement programs to better understand the full range of factors involved in implementing a mileage-based user fee, including public acceptance and administrative feasibility,” a spokesperson for the Federal Highway Administration told The Epoch Times.