An attorney representing poll challengers claiming systemic fraud during the election process in Wayne County, Michigan, urged a state judge to block the certification of the election and order an audit to determine the accuracy and integrity of the vote.
Kallman is representing two poll challengers—Cheryl Costantino and Edward McCall—who are alleging that election officials allowed various fraudulent processing of votes, including telling poll workers to backdate ballots, not verify signatures on absentee ballots, ignore signature mismatches, and push through ballots despite questionable validity.
Kallman and the attorneys for the City of Detroit and state election officials disputed over whether an audit could be ordered over the election results.
David Fink, the lawyer for the City of Detroit, argued that the case was “not ripe for adjudication” because there is no remedy at law until the votes have been certified.
He said the plaintiffs were asking the court to read the audit requirement under the state constitution as an “open-ended opportunity” for the court to order defendants to conduct an audit.
“But the court doesn’t have to do that,” Fink said while pointing out that the constitution only allows audits that are prescribed by law.
Fink said the only situation when that can occur, citing another statutory provision, is after the election when initiated by the Secretary of State.
In response, Kallman told the judge that “you can’t have an audit if the results are certified.”
“That’s the point because again the [defendants] are going to be arguing that the only remedy is a recount at that point,” Kallman said. “That’s why this is so critical.”
The judge said that he will issue a ruling on the motion by noon on Friday.