After Ottawa announced border COVID restrictions would be lifted on Oct. 1, major air carriers issued statements criticizing how the federal government managed the pandemic in the travel sector, with Air Canada saying the measures weren’t based on science.
Landry said the lifting of the restrictions will “greatly” facilitate travel and help to stabilize the sector and the Canadian economy.
The Air Canada statement came on Sept. 26, a few hours after Ottawa announced it was allowing interim orders affecting travel and border rules to expire on Sept. 30.
Unvaccinated individuals will no longer be required to quarantine for 14 days, pre- and on-arrival testing will be dropped, and the ArriveCan system which captures personal health and travel information will no longer be mandatory.
“While today’s announcement is a positive step, we urge the government not to lose momentum,” said Landry, calling for the streamlining of processing at airports with improved security, new technologies, and new trusted traveller programs.
He also said the “user-pay model that finances transportation” should be re-examined, due to “weaknesses and interdependencies” exposed by COVID-19.
The CEO of WestJet, Alexis von Hoensbroech, also commented on the lifting of the last restrictions.
Von Hoensbroech said WestJet is “relieved” that its customers will now be able to make decisions that are “best for them.”
Reacting to the statements from the airlines, an advocacy group that fought against vaccine mandates in transportation said the carriers are “trying to position themselves as sanctimonious innocents.”
“[They’re] pretending they knew all along ‘the science’ didn’t support the policies, ones they went above and beyond to support in their actions,” said Greg Hill, an airline pilot and co-founder of Free to Fly.
In-Flight Transmission Low
Air Canada has not explained why it thinks the federal restrictions were not “justified by science,” but available information from the federal government and the industry indicate both considered the risk of viral in-flight transmission to be low.An epidemiologist from the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) testified during cross-examination in court in May that the travel vaccine mandate was based on scant information on the impacts of vaccination on in-flight transmission of the virus.
Waddell was testifying as a government witness in defence of the travel vaccine mandate challenged by four lawsuits.
PHAC noted other factors in the statement, such as modelling on the Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 waves and lower hospitalization and death rates.