One of the world’s largest tech trade groups says the federal government’s online streaming bill will place a “regulatory hand” on how consumers choose content and must be rewritten.
“Specifically, Canada should be cautious and precise about attempting to influence or define the information that is available to users via search.”
The bill would also apply to platforms such as YouTube and Spotify, requiring them to promote Canadian artists.
‘Lack of Precision’
The CTA expressed concerns over “the breadth and lack of precision” in the current text of Bill C-11 which will result in “potential prescriptive and corrosive effects.”The group also stressed that the nature of how individuals and companies communicate on the internet should not be considered the same as how radio and TV broadcasters operate.
“The Internet offers users the ability to post as well as to choose, receive, and store spoken, musical, and video expression and content,” the association said.
“This ability to share should not be assumed to turn users into broadcasters, nor should it subject users even to remotely comparable obligations and regulations.”
“Absolutely, it is not,” Rodriguez answered when asked by Liberal MP Anthony Housefather if the content is regulated by the bill.
Future Uncertain
Bill C-11 passed the third reading in the House of Commons on June 21.The legislative process was condemned by some Conservative MPs, however, with MP John Nater saying the Liberal government “shut down debate at every step” in order to rush the bill through Parliament.
Senators have signalled they will not be pressured to speed up consideration of the bill, claiming they had thwarted government ploys to push it through to the upper house.
“The Senate must and will conduct a full and transparent study of the bill.”
The CTA said Bill C-11 “fails to provide demarcation, guidance, or limitation on when user generated content is subject to regulation.”
“If Parliament is unable to draw lines today that more precisely reflect drafters’ intent, there is no reason to assume that regulators will be able to do so in the future.”