If someone you love is being threatened or physically attacked, do you have the right to defend them? And even more so, when police are being defunded and when criminals are being released on the streets, do you have a right to protect yourself?
Do you have to just let things happen? Must you just watch while innocent people are victimized by criminals? Well, that’s the question currently on trial in New York.
If you read media outlets on the right, you’ll hear that he was arrested 42 times between 2013 and 2021.
In 2015, he was convicted of trying to kidnap a 7-year-old girl in Inwood, New York, and was sentenced to four months in jail. Then, in 2021, he was arrested for punching a 67-year-old woman in the face as she exited a subway train in New York’s East Village, breaking her nose and fracturing her orbital bone.
He pleaded guilty, and while facing 15 months in an alternative-to-incarceration program, he skipped his court date, and he had a warrant out for his arrest since February.
Nobody was initially charged. Video of the incident, which was limited to when Neely had already been restrained, was quickly picked up by political actors to play into the country’s race narratives.
She said it was “disgusting” that the man who allegedly killed Neely wasn’t charged.
It also turned out that the radical organization that staged the subway protest had previously teamed up in other protests with the Young Communist League of the Communist Party USA.
So let’s dig into this. Soros finances the campaigns of radical district attorneys who let criminals off the hook. A criminal is killed by people defending themselves when the city’s justice system fails. A radical Congress member, whose political campaign was notably assisted by a media network with funding from Soros, comes out and calls for arrests. Then, a radical group funded by Soros stages a protest while being backed by a communist group tied to that same politician, also calling for arrests. Seems to be a lot of overlap here.
Regardless of the Soros “above and below” strategy at play, former U.S. Marine Daniel Penny was arrested in Neely’s death. He’s now facing a felony charge of second-degree manslaughter, although he holds that he acted in self-defense.
So is this really about crime, then? Is it really about justice? Or is it about something else? Well, it’s not clear. But what we can say is that the narratives aren’t lining up. Many politicians who called for Penny’s arrest were simultaneously criticizing the use of justice. They were noting that young men are being sent to prison, when, in reality, many just need help. Yet they did this while also calling for Penny to be sent to prison.
Others were more direct. Others suggested this may not be about manslaughter or about justice or even about mental health. Instead, they’re saying this is about race.
For conservatives, it’s not about race. Instead, it’s about whether you’re allowed to defend yourself. The case has become a symbol of what’s wrong with defunding the police and about whether people are being selectively prosecuted, based not on crime but on the color of their skin.
When people such as Adams make it about race, other people start wondering whether the case would be treated differently if race weren’t an issue.
This is the point at which many cities in the United States find themselves. The common view, at least among conservatives, is this: Police have been made unable to do their jobs, the courts appear to have a swinging door, and violent individuals such as Neely are allowed to attack, harass, and generally menace people.
So if nobody will protect you, what are your options? Even if you see others being attacked or harassed, should you do anything to help them? Should you allow them to be attacked? Or do you want to risk going to prison simply for stepping up to help?
In the natural world, self-defense is written into the DNA of life. Even bugs have the means to defend themselves. Nearly every creature on earth has been given by God a means to defend itself, whether it be claws, teeth, stingers, or other means.
Humans create tools, such as swords and guns, to defend ourselves. And this has held true throughout all human history. The right to self-defense is the right to life. And the right to guard life is one of the main pillars of law.