Several dozen House Democrats signed a letter asking President Joe Biden to give up his sole authority to launch nuclear weapons and “consider modifying” the command and control of the U.S. nuclear forces.
“While any president would presumably consult with advisors before ordering a nuclear attack, there is no requirement to do so. The military is obligated to carry out the order if they assess it is legal under the laws of war. Under the current posture of U.S. nuclear forces, that attack would happen in minutes.”
“Past presidents have threatened nuclear attacks on other countries or exhibited concerning behavior that cast doubt on their judgment,” according to his tweet.
According to the letter, the lawmakers proposed to require more officials, including the vice president and House speaker, to “concur with a launch order.”
The Epoch Times has reached out to Panetta’s office and the White House for comment.
In January, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) claimed she spoke with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley about protecting the nuclear codes from former President Donald Trump.
Pelosi said she spoke to Milley on Jan. 5 “to discuss available precautions for preventing an unstable president from initiating military hostilities or accessing the launch codes and ordering a nuclear strike.”
However, despite her claim, the power has remained with the White House since President Harry Truman ordered two atomic bombs be dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II.
Typically, a military aide shadows the president and has a black briefcase known as the “nuclear football.” A president is legally able to order a nuclear attack with the United States’ arsenal of weapons, including intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched missiles, or via strategic bombers.