Sens. James Lankford (R-Okla.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said the White House should hand over a copy of former national security adviser John Bolton’s upcoming book after The New York Times published alleged details on Jan. 26, claiming Bolton wrote that he was told by President Donald Trump about a freeze on aid to Ukraine.
“My encouragement would be: If John Bolton’s got something to say, there’s plenty of microphones all over the country that he should step forward and start talking about it right now,” he said.
The NY Times, citing the book, claimed Bolton said he was told about a linkage between military aid and investigations, renewing calls among Democrats to call Bolton to testify in the Senate impeachment trial. However, several White House officials and Trump have disputed Bolton’s assertion, and the newspaper didn’t provide any excerpts from the book.
Lankford echoed a statement made by Graham, the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, who publicly urged the White House to deliver a copy of the manuscript.
“If we add to the record, we’re going to call Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, and all these other people.”
Graham also took to Twitter to call for the manuscript, writing that it should “be made available to the Senate, if possible, in a classified setting where each Senator has the opportunity to review the manuscript and make their own determination.”
“If John Bolton said this, it was only to sell a book,” the president wrote on Jan. 26.
Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard professor and Trump legal team member, referred to the book while defending the president on Jan. 27 on the Senate floor.
“If the president, any president, were to have done what the [New York] Times reported about the content of the Bolton manuscript, that would not constitute an impeachable offense,” Dershowitz said. "Let me repeat: Nothing in the Bolton revelations, even if true, would rise to the level of an abuse of power or an impeachable offense.
“That is clear from the history. That is clear from the language of the Constitution,” he continued. “You cannot turn conduct that is not impeachable into impeachable conduct simply by using words like ‘quid pro quo’ and ‘personal benefit.’”