The State Bar of California is moving to disbar attorney and former law professor John Eastman for supporting President Donald Trump’s efforts to challenge the 2020 election results.
In a disciplinary action filed on Thursday, the regulatory body of California lawyers claimed that Eastman should be stripped of his license over his actions in the period leading up to, and in the aftermath of, the Jan. 6, 2021, protest that devolved into a breach of the U.S. Capitol building.
Eastman is accused of violating multiple attorney ethics rules as he provided legal advice and formulated legal strategies in aid of Trump’s presidential bid. The state bar’s trial counsel brought 11 counts against him, including one count of “failure to support the Constitution,” two count of “seeking to mislead the court,” and six counts of “misrepresentation.”
The counsel particularly took issue with, among other things, Eastman’s attempt to convince Vice President Mike Pence that he had the authority to reject electoral votes from seven states where the integrity of the election was called into question. Pence eventually refused to take the advice, as Eastman laid out in a two-page memo.
“[Eastman] knew, or was grossly negligent in not knowing, that this assertion was false and misleading,” the counsel alleged.
Eastman’s attorney, Randall Miller, said in a statement that his client disputes “every aspect” of the accusations.
“Any lawyer engaged to provide his or her legal assessment in a dynamic, consequential, and often emotional arena should be deeply troubled by the notion that a licensing authority (bar) can take their license if they do not like the lawyer’s advice, or find the advocacy distasteful,” Miller said in a statement.
“The foundation of any engagement is that the lawyer shall protect the client’s interests, at every turn,” he added. “This is includes raising all viable options.”
The complaint now heads to the State Bar Court of California, which will ultimately decide on it.
Eastman has dismissed the committee’s recommendation as an “absurdly partisan” move carrying no legal weight.