A former head of security for the House of Commons said it is “naive” to think that enforcement alone can resolve protests against COVID-19 mandates in Ottawa and elsewhere, as the federal government pursues an extension of the Emergencies Act to deal with the matter.
“Enforcement alone is always degrees of losing. Simplistic view of Rule of Law. So naive to think this was going to be all resolved through enforcement. Not only those who are labelled populist but thousands of nurses and 100s of Doctors, Educators were vaccine hesitant,” Vickers wrote of the Freedom Convoy protests and other demonstrations against COVID-19 mandates and restrictions.
The Freedom Convoy protest in Ottawa began as a demonstration against the federal government’s COVID-19 vaccination mandate for all truck drivers crossing the Canada-U.S. border. It soon expanded to a national-scale movement after large convoys of trucks arrived in the capital on Jan. 29, attracting supporters across Canada who want to see an end to all COVID-19 mandates and restrictions. It has also sparked similar protests around the world.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had refused to meet with the truckers, or have representatives hear their grievances, during the three weeks they remained in Ottawa. He declared a state of emergency on Feb. 14, invoking the Emergencies Act to give the police sweeping additional powers to oust the protesters, including compelling towing companies to remove the vehicles encamped in the city’s downtown core.
Financial measures were also brought in to allow financial institutions to freeze the accounts of individuals and corporations suspected of being associated with the protest without a court order. The government also broadened anti-money laundering and terrorist financing laws to cover crowdfunding platforms and the payment service providers they use.