The Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) decision to shorten the interval time for Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine to five months was based on scientific evidence that included the safety data from Pfizer’s booster shots given in Israel, the health regulator wrote in its authorization letter to Moderna.
The FDA argues that the change is necessary because of the “highly contagious Omicron variant, which spreads more rapidly” than the original virus and other variants so far.
The FDA claims to have reviewed various publications that weren’t cited in the letter along with data of Israel’s 4.1 million citizens who have received the Pfizer vaccine booster.
The federal health regulator acknowledged that the overall composition of the two messenger RNA vaccines differed, but because “both are mRNA vaccines,” they “are relatively similar.”
“Acknowledging the differences, it is reasonable to make the inference that the safety data on the [five] month interval for booster doses obtained in the population in Israel can apply to the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine,” the FDA said.
Revision to Moderna’s booster dose drew criticism from Dr. Vinay Prasad, a hematologist-oncologist and an associate professor of epidemiology at the University of California–San Francisco, who argued that the FDA’s decision was not based on scientific evidence and that “it is NOT REASONABLE to make a Moderna determination from Pfizer data.”
He also compared the doses of the two mRNA vaccines, saying “Moderna’s dose is 100, 100, and 50 for booster; Pfizer is 30, 30, 30,” adding that “Moderna has Way more myocarditis.”
When asked about why the FDA based their decision on Pfizer’s safety data instead of Moderna’s vaccine booster data, a spokesperson from the FDA, in an email to The Epoch Times, provided a link to the authorization letter and said that a “memo outlining our decision should be posted in the very near future.”
The Epoch Times has reached out to Moderna for comment.