Ex-chief of Defence Angry Over War Memorial’s Plan to Demolish Anzac Hall

The view to Parliament House along ANZAC Parade during the Remembrance Day Service at the Australian War Memorial on November 11, 2018 in Canberra, Australia. Tracey Nearmy/Getty Images

A former defence chief has blasted the approval of a $500 million redevelopment of the Australian War Memorial in Canberra.

Retired admiral Chris Barrie has been a vocal opponent of the major project, fearing it will completely undermine the national institution.

“I guess the game is over in terms of the fact it is going to happen, but I’m afraid it won’t be a memorial for very much longer,” he told ABC radio on Tuesday.

“It might be a place of entertainment but in my view it will not be the place of remembrance that I grew up with.”

Mr Barrie said the redevelopment would turn the memorial into a theme park.

“I recall the place of remembrance that I used to take visitors to as being unique around the world,” he said.

“To try and turn it into a theme park or a place of entertainment, whatever words we want to use, is not right.”

Mr Barrie is most concerned that in the pursuit of a “bigger and better” attraction, future generations of Australians will lose the opportunity to quietly reflect on the country’s military history.

“We’ve got plenty of theme parks in this country, we don’t need another one.”

A woman places a poppy on the Roll of Honour for World War I after an ANZAC Day Dawn Service at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra. Around some 60,000 Australians were killed during World War I and just over 27,000 would die in the war that followed. Mark Nolan/Getty Images

The National Capital Authority has given the nod for early works at the memorial, including the demolition of Anzac Hall.

At least 140 trees will be removed as part of the redevelopment, which will eventually be replaced by 250 native trees.

The NCA, which has published a 1200-page consultation report, received 601 submissions during its consultation process, of which just three were in support.

Key concerns were the need for the expansion, tree removal, the impacts on heritage values and the cost.

The memorial argues the project will address constraints to the existing use of the building, improve the overall visitor and veterans’ experience and maintain its significance as a national cultural institution.