President Joe Biden is the latest recipient of Sen. Joni Ernst’s (R-Iowa) Squeal Award, for what she says are the billions of tax dollars being wasted by “the Biden Boondoggle Express” on costly California commuter rail projects.
Ernst pointed to two major California commuter rail projects—the California High-Speed Rail and the San Francisco Central Subway Extension—that Biden gave multibillion-dollar budget increases, even as both projects have long records of over-budget expenditures and construction delays.
The California High-Speed Rail will connect Los Angeles and San Francisco—if it’s ever completed.
The San Francisco Central Subway Extension would expand the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) underground system to nearby San Jose and Silicon Valley and has long enjoyed the enthusiastic support of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
She also warned of yet another California rail project.
Biden’s Bureaucratic Boondoggles
“The price has ballooned from $3.9 billion in 2016 to $6.7 billion today. While the cost is increasing, Caltrain is experiencing one of the most dramatic declines in ridership in the nation [according to The Mercury News]. Nevertheless, the Biden administration has given the project the green light (pdf) to receive taxpayer dollars,” Ernst said.The Caltrain runs above ground, while the BART extension would be an underground system.
A White House spokesman didn’t respond by press time to a request by The Epoch Times for comment.
To put an end to such federal spending, Ernst said she’s introducing two measures. The first of the two, the “Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act,” would expand existing public reporting requirements for transportation projects costing $1 billion or more to all federally funded transportation programs.
The second proposal is the “Put the Brakes on Boondoggles Act,” which Ernst claims “would bring each of these runaway trains to a squealing halt.” A draft copy of the proposal provided to The Epoch Times includes two provisions.
The first provision would require the secretary of transportation to stop federal funding for a program when “the overall cost projection to complete the project exceeds the original cost projection by at least $1 billion.”
The second provision would require federal funding to end when “the operational and administrative costs of the service provided by the project are projected to exceed the revenues generated from ridership annually over the next decade.”