The former Beatles member said the move would open the door for AI firms to “rip off” copyright material, making it more difficult for creators to retain control of their work, while impacting careers.
“You get young guys, girls, coming up, and they write a beautiful song, and they don’t own it, and they don’t have anything to do with it. And anyone who wants can just rip it off,” McCartney said.
“The truth is, the money’s going somewhere. Somebody’s getting paid, so why shouldn’t it be the guy who sat down and wrote ‘Yesterday?’”
However, McCartney urged UK leaders to reconsider their plans.
“We’re the people, you’re the government. You’re supposed to protect us. That’s your job,” McCartney said. “So you know, if you’re putting through a bill, make sure you protect the creative thinkers, the creative artists, or you’re not going to have them.”
In a statement to the BBC, a government spokesperson reaffirmed the proposal would only move forward “once we are confident that we are delivering clarity, control and transparency for artists and the sector, alongside appropriate access to data for AI innovators.”
The consultation period for proposed policy changes or feedback closes on Feb. 25, before a final decision is made on the matter.
McCartney and Beatles drummer Ringo Starr used AI back in 2023 to produce their final song “Now and Then,” after reportedly extracting and using the vocals from a demo by the late John Lennon to complete the track.
Meanwhile, AI has become a major topic of conversation in the music industry at home and abroad in recent years, with a growing list of artists speaking out against the technology.