Mariah Carey Didn’t Plagiarize ‘All I Want for Christmas Is You’ From Other Songwriters, Judge Rules

Mariah Carey Didn’t Plagiarize ‘All I Want for Christmas Is You’ From Other Songwriters, Judge Rules
Mariah Carey performs during the 2019 Billboard Music Awards at MGM Grand Garden Arena in Las Vegas on May 1, 2019. Ethan Miller/Getty Images
Wim De Gent
Updated:
0:00

A federal judge in Los Angeles has ruled that Mariah Carey did not plagiarize her iconic holiday hit “All I Want for Christmas Is You” from other songwriters.

On Wednesday, Judge Mónica Ramírez Almadani granted Carey and her co-writer and co-defendant Walter Afanasieff a summary judgment—resolving the case without the need for a trial.

The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by songwriters Andy Stone (artist name Vince Vance) from Louisiana and Troy Powers of Tennessee, alleged that Carey’s 1994 hit borrowed from their 1989 country song of the same name.

The two songwriters sought $20 million in damages, alleging that both songs shared a unique theme, portraying a person who rejects material gifts in favor of being with their loved one expressed in a letter to Santa.

Stone and Powers argued that there was an “overwhelming likelihood” Carey and Afanasieff had heard their song—which at one point reached No. 31 on Billboard’s Hot Country chart—and infringed their copyright by taking significant elements from it.

After reviewing expert testimony from both sides, Judge Ramírez Almadani sided with Carey’s defense. She determined that both songs employed common Christmas themes and clichés that predated either work, and that Carey’s song used them in a distinct way.

The judge ruled that the plaintiffs failed to prove a substantial similarity existed between the two songs.

Ramírez Almadani also ordered sanctions against the plaintiffs and their lawyers, saying their suit and subsequent filings were frivolous and that the plaintiffs’ attorneys “made no reasonable effort to ensure that the factual contentions asserted have evidentiary support.”

Because of this, the Judge ordered them to cover at least some of Carey’s legal fees.

Stone and Powers’s lawyer Gerard P. Fox said in an email that he was disappointed in the judge’s decision.

Fox said it is his experience that judges at this level “nearly always now dismiss a music copyright case and that one must appeal to reverse and get the case to the jury.”

“My client will make a decision shortly on whether to appeal. We filed based on the opinions of two esteemed musicologists who teach at great colleges,” Fox said.

Carey’s song has only grown in popularity since its release 31 years ago, becoming a staple Christmas season tune. It has topped the Billboard Hot 100 every year for the past six years—not just among holiday-themed charts, but also by airplay, sales, and streaming.

Carey and Afanasieff have had their own public disagreement—though not one that’s gone to court—over who wrote how much of the song. The two, who had a history working on Carey’s albums “Emotions” and “Music Box,” didn’t talk for 20 years after Carey’s 1997 divorce, per Afanasieff, owing to the fact that he continued working for her ex, Tommy Mottola, then head of Sony Music.
The Associated Press contributed to this article.
Wim De Gent
Wim De Gent
Author
Wim De Gent is a writer for NTD News, focusing primarily on U.S. and world stories.