The fight venue is under discussion, with Las Vegas and the Coliseum in Rome being top runners. A pre-match war of words, complete with base insults, is now reaching the stage of a Musk threat to sue over Mr. Zuckerberg’s new Threads app that mimics some Twitter features.
But, Mr. Musk’s most dangerous game lies far to the east of Las Vegas, in Beijing. There, the challenge is so dire that Tesla Man is apparently being forced to publicly subscribe to socialist ideology to pursue his billion-dollar business venture.
By now, the venture is nearly captured by the Chinese Communist Party and the companies it controls. But hey, what true capitalist wouldn’t turn socialist for the chance to make a few billion more bucks, for as long as the party lasts?
On July 6, Mr. Musk again waxed effusive over China’s economic and technological prowess. He ignored inconvenient comparisons like Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.
While Mr. Musk is ready to insult Mr. Zuckerberg at the drop of a hat, he has issued little of his characteristic unvarnished truth against Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s excesses, including totalitarianism and genocide. Mr. Musk apparently doesn’t bite the hand that simultaneously feeds and crushes him. He gives back in spades, which makes him complicit.
Other EV signers included BYD, Nio, and SAIC.
Perhaps Tesla was following the letter and not the spirit of price-fixing? Yet more evidence, if any were needed, that there is apparently no honor among thieves.
While the pledge appeared to support market principles by taking a stand against disruption of “fair competition with abnormal pricing,” there is nothing abnormal about price wars in market systems unless one seller attempts to undercut another so much as to sell beneath the price of production in what amounts to dumping of goods on the market.
Dumping is used by large businesses (and countries like China) to put relatively smaller competitors (and countries) out of business, creating monopoly conditions in the process. Monopoly capitalism, which is what Beijing apparently wants to bring back from the 19th century after reading all about the Rockefellers and Carnegies, is not conducive to the competition required in truly free modern markets.
That Beijing would step in to increase prices for Chinese consumers should make them demand answers to the obvious questions: Are Mr. Musk and the others engaged in price-fixing at the direction of the CCP and at the expense of Chinese citizens? Is that the “true socialism” that seeks the “greatest good for all” according to Mr. Musk?
Mr. Musk’s apparent hypocrisy may confuse some, until they remember that he is really a capitalist milking China for all its got, while he lets China milk him for the technology the CCP needs to drive its global market expansion in self-driving EVs, not to mention who knows what else (SpaceX rockets?).
Mr. Musk and Beijing are in a deal with the devil by which they both come out ahead, while Chinese and American consumers are left behind paying more for electric cars, and national security, than they really should. That should be no surprise, as Chinese citizens, at least, have as a whole allowed themselves since the 1920s to be overtaken by the CCP. American citizens, and the global public, are now taking the same risk.