Online platforms could be forced to maintain a score of how truthful a person is, under new legislation proposed by MP John Penrose.
Penrose said that the purpose is to reduce the risk of harm to users of regulated services caused by “disinformation or misinformation.”
The person’s speech would then be “displayed in a way which allows any user easily to reach an informed view of the likely factual accuracy of the content at the same time as they encounter it.”
Penrose proposed in an amendment to the Online Safety Bill (pdf) that any “regulated service must provide an index of the historic factual accuracy of material published by each user” who has (a) produced user-generated content, (b) news publisher content, or (c) comments and reviews on provider contact whose content is viewed more widely than a minimum threshold to be defined and set by the UK online safety regulator Ofcom.”
The index must satisfy minimum quality criteria to be set by Ofcom, and “be displayed in a way which allows any user easily to reach an informed view of the likely factual accuracy of the content at the same time as they encounter it,” the amendment states.
“State arbitratation and indexing of truth and reliability is not practically possible nor is it desirable in a free society,” Victoria Hewson, head of regulatory affairs at the free-market think tank Institute of Economic Affairs, told The Epoch Times in an email.
‘Illiberal and Unrealistic’
Hewson questioned the feasibility of Penrose’s proposed amendment.“Asking social media, search engines, and Ofcom to gauge and record the ‘accuracy’ of content posted by millions of users is extreme, even by the illiberal and unrealistic standards of the Online Safety Bill,” said Hewson.
It is currently at report stage, which is a chance for the whole House to discuss and amend the bill.
The Online Safety Bill is also currently at the centre of a battle within the Conservative Party, with the government pushing through the legislation, but other Tory MPs coming out against it.
‘Serious Implications for Free Speech’
MP Kemi Badenoch took a swipe at the bill as she entered the Conservative leadership race, saying in an op-ed for The Times Of London, “Rather than legislate for hurt feelings as we risk doing with the Online Safety Bill, we must strengthen our democratic culture at a time when democratic values are under assault from without and within.”“It is wrong and dangerous to limit free speech. The Online Safety Bill is going to have some serious implications for free speech. I have supported the government in every single bill since becoming an MP. I’m not going to be supporting it this week in its present form,” she said.
The Epoch Times has contacted John Penrose for comment.