As more people question whether their local health policies are engaging in government overreach, parents are becoming citizen investigative journalists who form constitutional rights groups to hold policymakers accountable.
For Kelly Wiggen in Rutherford County, North Carolina, it began when she said the mask mandates in her child’s school weren’t adding up.
From there, the business owner turned researcher started digging, requesting documents, and connecting dots.
Government officials, or anyone with a spouse who is an elected official, can’t be a member but can be invited to attend, with a limited timeframe in which to speak.
“There can be zero conflicts of interest,” Wiggen told The Epoch Times. “It’s going to flip the tables on them.”
Wiggen has been presenting her findings at various freedom rallies, such as one held by the Catawba County Mama Bears on Saturday.
The money trail she’s followed has led her to specific signed agreements between local health directors and the federal government that she said give the federal government unlimited power over local governments because of those local entities accepting COVID-19 relief aid.
“I think most people have the security in mind that local entities aren’t going to allow the federal government to come in and do whatever it wants,” she said. “We look to these entities to protect us from that, but they’ve been bought off with these agreements.”
Terms and Conditions
One agreement she’s examined, signed by Rutherford County Health Director Karen Powell, states that as a recipient of funds awarded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) through coronavirus-relief packages, the local health department must comply with existing and future directives from the HHS secretary and assist the U.S. government in the “implementation and enforcement of federal orders related to quarantine and isolation.”“This was an agreement that the local health director signed to accept $115,000 for a school liaison position,” Wiggen said. “This federalizes our health department and every health department that took the money.”
Waves of federal funding to local governments and agencies have come from the $8.3 billion Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act; the $2.2 trillion Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act; the $484 billion Paycheck Protection Program and Health Enhancement Act; the $2.3 trillion Consolidated Appropriations Act; the $10 billion Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations (CRRSA) Act, and the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act, all of which require compliance with current and future federal directives “as they relate to mitigating the spread of COVID-19.”
“I promise you every local entity—sheriff, school, health department—that signed an agreement for COVID funding sold control of that entity to the federal government,” Wiggen said.
She said this has been seen with local school boards reversing from their initial “mask optional” stance at the beginning of the school semester back to mask required.
“I suspect they were reminded of the money they took,” Wiggen said.
In June, HHS announced that it had awarded $1 billion in ARP funds to pre-school Head Start programs nationwide.
The CRRSA includes supplemental funding for COVID-19 vaccine programs to achieve “broad-based distribution,” and has the same verbiage requiring compliance with current and future directives that includes “vaccine strike teams” and “mobile vaccine clinics.”
‘There’s Nothing to Stop Them’
“If you combine all of this together, there is nothing that could stop a federal vaccine mandate for our children in schools,” she said. “If your local government accepted COVID-19 money, that money is going to have the same terms and conditions, which means there is nothing they can do to stop the federal government from coming in and doing anything, and those local agencies actually agreed to assist.”“If Mandy Cohen or the federal health secretary wanted to require everyone to get the injection, there’s nothing to stop them,” Wiggen said. “If that’s a directive they can claim is attached to the stopping of the spread of COVID-19, our local agencies have already signed an agreement.”
Meanwhile, Wiggen said Rutherford County Schools voted on Thursday to continue its mask mandate until the CDC says the school system can go seven days without being in the “high transmission” category.
Decisions not Based on Science but Directives
In an earlier board meeting, she filmed the chairman of the Rutherford County Board of Education meeting stating, “We’re not here tonight to make a decision based on the science one way or the other. You can find as many experts on both sides as you want to find, those for it and those against it. We’re not here for that. We’re here for one thing, and that’s to make a decision based on a directive from our local health director on how the guidance is attributed to this toolkit and quarantine.”For Wiggen, the chairman’s statement reflects the national climate of health policies.
“Realistically, the way this country has been reacting, people will buy anything these days,” she said.