This tradition can be traced back to 1948, when the CCP was about to come to power in mainland China. They serve as a secret source of news to keep officials informed of the latest major events at home and abroad—which would not be available to ordinary citizens due to Beijing’s strict censorship rules.
On Global Sanctions
One section of the documents listed the latest global sanctions, categorized by different targeted countries, firms, and individuals. In the 12th issue (for the week of May 6-13, 2020), the “nei can” mentioned that Europe and the UK had imposed sanctions against six human rights abusers in Nicaragua. However, it did not include information about U.S. President Donald Trump extending an executive order issued the year prior that barred U.S. companies from working with or buying telecom equipment from companies deemed a threat to national security. The order was widely considered to be targeting Chinese telecom giant Huawei—which had been banned from the United States’ 5G rollout on security grounds.Negative Public Opinion over CCP Virus Filtered Out
Another “nei can” report summarized overseas public opinion on the CCP virus pandemic, as reflected in foreign media. In the report, the severity of the pandemic in foreign countries was highlighted. But there was no mention of growing criticism from the international community about the Chinese regime’s coverup of the pandemic.Economic Problems
The reports also made mention of economic reviews, which “spoke favorably of” China’s economy, the internal documents stated. They cited statements in foreign media explaining that India could not replace the role of China as “the world’s factory”; post-COVID-19 China was likely to lead the world into reopening; and China remained a popular destination for U.S. corporate investment.Online Public Opinion about ‘Two Sessions’
The “Two Sessions,” annual meetings of the CCP’s rubber-stamp legislature and its advisory body to enact policies and agendas, was held this year in May. During this period, “nei can” documents showed that Beijing kept track of domestic public opinion by analyzing online social media posts.According to a trends chart, on May 25 at 6 p.m., the degree of attention on the Two Sessions reached 40,000 points. Another analysis showed that attention on the subject reached 72 percent on social media platform Weibo and 20 percent on messaging app WeChat.
Political commentator Li Linyi noted that these so-called “internal references” are in fact not complete and censor out negative news in order to please Party leaders. To save the CCP’s face and comfort its officials, negative reports are discouraged within a one-party state, he said.