The three “magic weapons” possessed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) are propaganda, “united front tactics,” and the Chinese military—ranked in that order, according to Steven Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute.
During the war, the CCP always advanced first—not militarily, but by using a massive propaganda barrage in the nationalist areas, in which they placed stories favorable to the Party, softening up the opposition in those areas and creating an opening for the CCP, according to Mosher.
Then, the CCP moved into political organizations and entities of nationalist China, taking them over by using united front tactics.
“Then from those bridgeheads, from those stepping stones, then moving into control of the largest society, and oftentimes, military action not only came last—it came after the battle had essentially been won by these other two magic weapons: propaganda and united front tactics,” Mosher said.
“The CCP’s United Front Work Department (UFWD)—the agency responsible for coordinating these kinds of influence operations—mostly focuses on the management of potential opposition groups inside China, but it also has an important foreign influence mission,” the report reads.
CCP leader Xi Jinping also talked about these three magic weapons in the same order several years ago, according to Mosher.
“Everyone’s paying attention to the buildup in the People’s Liberation Army [the Chinese military], which is real and which is frightening,“ he said. ”But preceding that is this even more important buildup in propaganda efforts. ... And then, of course, there’s the united front tactics.”
One of the propaganda arms of the Chinese Communist Party that effectively operates on U.S. soil is a radio station located near Washington that broadcasts news and information at all times to the most important audience—at least in terms of public policy in the United States—the audience in and around the nation’s capital.
“The United States does not have a comparable radio station in and around Beijing, broadcasting news and information from the Voice of America or Radio Free Asia or stories from The Epoch Times into China,“ Mosher said. ”So this is a very one-sided effort.”
Among other means of the CCP’s propaganda are advertisements placed in major publications in the United States, he said.
Confucius Institutes seize control of the institutions within which they operate, at least in terms of dictating what they can talk about, and what they’re forbidden to talk about in regards to China, the author said.
“Official Hanban policy requires Confucius Institutes to adhere to Chinese law, including speech codes. Chinese teachers hired by, paid by, and accountable to the Chinese government face pressures to avoid sensitive topics, and American professors report pressure to self-censor,” the report said.
Mosher said, “Confucius Institutes, for example, have enabled the suppression of discussion of the persecution of the Falun Gong ... the discussion of the Uyghur genocide, of the oppression of Tibet, of the freedom that people enjoy on Taiwan, and of the ongoing suppression of the democracy movement in Hong Kong.
“A free society which prizes the free flow of information, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of association is particularly vulnerable to these first two magic weapons.
“If you lose the battle for the hearts and minds of the people, and if you lose control of some of your major institutions in a free country like the United States, the third magic weapon is almost unnecessary because you’ve already surrendered your minds and your institutions to the Chinese Communist Party.
Main Perils to CCP’s Rule
The two main perils the CCP perceives as a threat to its rule are an accurate discussion of the history and the ideology of the CCP itself, Mosher said.At the time of the Tiananmen demonstrations in 1989, “a new generation of Chinese were disillusioned by their experience and the experience of their parents and grandparents under communism—which has killed tens of millions of Chinese over the decades—disillusioned by the Cultural Revolution, with its massive destruction of traditional Chinese culture and traditional Chinese views,” he said.
There was a hope “that in recoiling against that, they would come to admire and emulate the West and that the Chinese Communist Party would collapse under its own weight as people fled the party, as millions of people resigned from the party in the early 90s,” he said.
“Yet in reaction, the Chinese Communist Party, which was shocked by the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, decided to embark on a massive propaganda exercise putting in place in the schools—basically kindergarten through college—national-patriotic education programs. And they were able to stave off collapse.”
The CCP increasingly moved toward totalitarian control of China, and continues doing so to the present day, Mosher said.
In Mosher’s opinion, the CCP would be interested in that technology because it wants to control the very thoughts of the Chinese people.
Although the CCP using microchips in the brain to control people “may be fairly far off,” the regime has been using “artificial intelligence to track people, their actions, their thoughts, their purchases with the goal of trying to control [people’s] very thoughts,” Mosher said.
Out of the 20 cities in the world with the highest density of surveillance cameras per capita, the top 19 of those cities are located in China, the expert noted, adding that 24/7 surveillance on social media has also been used by the CCP.
Some people in the West realized that people who control high tech or run the largest investment firms on Wall Street that invest heavily in China “have come to admire, and even want to emulate the Chinese system,” Mosher said.
“We’re a long way from replicating the Chinese social credit system in the United States in one sense. And yet, in another sense, we see that we have our own battalions of censors monitoring the internet.
“In China, it’s done by the state. ... [Here] it’s being done by nominally private companies. And yet those private companies seem to be very, very closely tied to the current administration.
“We are moving all too rapidly in the direction of becoming like China.”