Private Chinese Companies Worry Beijing Is More Focused on Big State-Owned Firms

Private Chinese Companies Worry Beijing Is More Focused on Big State-Owned Firms
The cityscape of the Beijing Central Business District, or Beijing CBD, is reflected in a pond during sunset on Oct. 17, 2018. Thomas Peter/Reuters
Reuters
Updated:

BEIJING—An unprecedented convergence of economic stresses this year is weighing on China’s once vibrant private sector, compelling some entrepreneurs to question the effectiveness—and true intent—of Beijing’s policies.

Some of the millions of struggling private firms are worried that Beijing is more focused on supporting giant state-owned enterprises (SOEs), even as China celebrates the 40th anniversary of landmark economic reforms that rekindled entrepreneurship in the communist country.

In a meeting with entrepreneurs aired on national TV last week, Chinese leader Xi Jinping threw his backing behind private companies, pledging tax cuts and an equal business environment for all firms. He also reaffirmed financial support for the sector.

But Xi also reiterated his defense of the state sector, saying reforms and tighter supervision of state firms will help protect state assets that belong to all Chinese people.

“The long-term pressure will be very big, because it’s obvious that large enterprises will have more and more advantages, and small firms can only be ‘eaten up’ or go bankrupt,” said Bi Jiacheng, manager at Nantong Kunstronger Labor Protective Products Co, which makes protective gloves in eastern Jiangsu Province.

“Private firms provide most jobs and stable taxes, that’s why the state needs to stabilize the private sector.”

With economic growth slowing and Beijing cracking down on riskier forms of borrowing, China’s private sector is grappling with a financing crunch that has pushed some firms into distress.

This year, at least 40 listed private firms have announced stake sales to state firms, in response to financial stresses worsened by the stock-market rout, according to state media.

Private firms say they have also lost out to SOEs as environmental inspectors shut small factories in the name of cutting pollution, while many exporters are vulnerable to the trade war with the United States. Faced with uncertainties, some private firms have chosen to maintain the status quo, rather than expand.

Private Sector in Retreat

One private ceramics manufacturer said his firm was forced to relocate operations from Zibo in eastern Shandong Province after a major industrial restructuring saw many local private firms shuttered in a pollution and regulatory crackdown. Another owner of a company supplying food to the transportation industry complained his business had shrunk due to cannibalization from the state sector.

In the past, food for passengers was mainly manufactured by private companies, but currently SOEs dominate, he said, declining to be identified for fear of retribution.

For much of the past three decades, private firms have flourished as China opened up its economy. Then, in the last global financial crisis, SOEs staged a comeback as a result of Beijing’s massive stimulus —a shift popularly known as “the state sector advances, the private sector retreats.”

Funding Support

China’s manufacturing sector barely grew in October, while the services sector crept close to the line that divides growth from contraction.

Last month, the central bank rolled out a program to promote bond financing by private firms, after achieving limited success in channeling more credit to small firms, via four reserve requirement cuts this year. While new bank loans have risen this year, other “shadow” lending has shrunk, weighing on the capacity of smaller private firms to grow and prosper.

“We can see some results in the short term, given the central government has sent out strong signals and taken strong measures to support small and private firms,” said an adviser to the government.

“But this is not enough. Over the long term, we need to look at fundamental ideas and fundamental reforms—how to deal with the relationship between SOEs and private firms.”

By Kevin Yao