A group of former Hong Kong district councilors now in exile has called on Hong Kong citizens to boycott the upcoming district council elections held by Hong Kong authorities.
“Since the forced implementation of the National Security Law in Hong Kong in 2020, the Chinese Communist Party and the Hong Kong authorities have been systematically changing the political landscape of Hong Kong in a destructive manner to stifle all voices opposing the Chinese Communist Party,” reads an Oct. 16 statement by Hong Kong District Councilor Diaspora Network.
“Recently, they [the government] announced their intention to hold so-called district council elections by the end of this year, aiming to replace the district councillors elected by Hong Kong citizens through democratic processes in 2019, who represented the voices of Hong Kong’s citizens.
“We, as the last group of district councillors elected by the citizens of Hong Kong, solemnly declare that we will not recognize this supposed election arranged by the Hong Kong and Chinese authorities, and we call on all Hong Kong citizens to boycott this so-called election and the so-called councillors elected through it.”
Hong Kong’s district councils were predominantly democratically elected until 2022. During the Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Movement in 2019, pro-democracy councillors seized over 80 percent of the seats. To control Hong Kong’s district councils, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) tampered with Hong Kong’s electoral system in 2022, reducing the number of elected seats from 452 to 88.
The turnout rate in the 2021 Hong Kong Legislative Council election was only 30.2 percent, and it is estimated that the turnout rate of the District Council elections this time will only be 20 to 25 percent, according to Mr. Lam.
‘Participating in Sham Elections is Democratic Regression’
The former councillors alleged that new district councils could no longer represent Hong Kong citizens but are “propaganda teams under government’s control.”“While some citizens may believe that they can ‘vote’ for the former ‘pro-democracy’ figures to give them a lifeline and uphold their presence in the community, participating in sham elections, recognizing tyranny, and pretending that everything is normal in Hong Kong will only endorse democratic regression and inflict harm on the overall well-being of Hong Kong,” reads the statement.
Sam Yip, a member of the Network who co-signed the statement, said that even though some candidates may have good intentions to serve the community, their participation in this “sham election” could only backfire.
Polling Station Officers Appointed by Disciplinary Forces
Tsang Kwok Wai Erick, the Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs, said on Oct. 16 that given the chaos in past elections, coupled with the fact that the disciplinary forces are experienced in law enforcement and can cope with unforeseen circumstances, the Presiding Officers or Deputy Presiding Officers of the 600 polling stations for the upcoming District Elections will be staffed by members of disciplinary forces as far as possible.The former councillors criticized the move as “handing over the governing power of Hong Kong to the armed forces,” and “fundamentally violating the principle of civilian politics that has been in place since the establishment of Hong Kong.”
Former Councillor Still Wanted for Boycotting LegCo Election
This is not the first time that some have advocated boycotting elections in Hong Kong under the control of Beijing.Under the joint efforts of the CCP and the Hong Kong government, Hong Kong’s electoral system has been drastically curtailed to “perfect” the system and ensure that “patriots rule Hong Kong.” In addition, a vetting system has been introduced to check the eligibility of candidates and reject any that do not meet these requirements.
The authorities also legislated two new offences under the electoral system to suppress opposition, including “intentionally obstructing or preventing another person from voting at an election” and “inciting another person, by any activity in public during an election, not to vote or to cast an invalid vote.”