According to Richemont’s financial report released this week, Chinese consumers scaled back on luxury spending in the last quarter of 2024 amid broad economic weakness ahead of the new lunar year.
That’s thanks to the end of the “bubble prosperity,” which left Chinese households saddled with debt, falling asset prices, and limited job opportunities as economic growth spattered.
For more than a decade, the world’s second-largest economy has relied on monetary easing and robust government spending to boost economic growth and compensate for the challenges it faced in its export markets.
The problem with these policies is that they blow asset bubbles that take the economy for a wild ride: a temporary boom followed by a bust.
For instance, monetary easing boosts risky household assets such as equities and real estate. Still, it ends in a bust once the nation’s central bank drives interest rates near zero, leaving no ammunition for further stimulus.
It happened in Japan in the late 1980s and early 1990s, and it has happened in China over the past decade.
Likewise, fiscal stimulus, often directed to projects that aren’t economically feasible, such as bridges to everywhere and nowhere, airports without travelers, and shopping malls without shoppers, fuels economic booms. At the same time, the construction lasts but is followed by busts when it ends.
Low economic growth and lower asset prices give Chinese consumers little resources and appetite to buy discretionary items such as imported luxuries.
“China’s slowing economy is reshaping consumer priorities, with a clear shift away from discretionary luxury spending,” Michael Ashley Schulman, chartered financial analyst, told The Epoch Times.
“This trend not only impacts global luxury giants like Richemont, Porsche, LVMH, Kering, and Burberry but also signals broader economic caution among Chinese consumers as they navigate uncertain times and tensions with the West rise.”
In addition, Schulman sees national pride campaigns persuading Chinese consumers to favor domestic brands, particularly in sectors such as technology, fashion, and cosmetics—with high-quality and lower price points.
“Past tensions, such as boycotts of brands like H&M and Nike over their stances on Xinjiang cotton, have also helped to fuel public sentiment against Western goods,” he added.