CCP Implicates Itself by Attacking Survivor of Forced Organ Harvesting: Human Rights Watchers

Cheng Peiming, a Falun Gong practitioner who survived the Chinese Communist Party's forced organ harvesting regime in China, speaks during a press conference in Washington on July 3, 2024. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times

WASHINGTON—The Chinese regime may have inadvertently implicated itself in the crime of forced organ harvesting in its attempt to discredit the first survivor to ever come forward out of China, human rights watchers say.

In a rare public response, a string of Chinese state-run outlets and police bureaus carried a lengthy article attacking a Falun Gong practitioner, now in the United States, who came forward in weeks earlier publicly telling his story of having had parts of his liver and lung forcibly removed while in the Chinese prison system.

Cheng Peiming, 59, suffered six years of torture while in prison in communist China for practicing Falun Gong, a traditional spiritual belief espousing the values of truthfulness, compassion, and tolerance—that Beijing has tried to eliminate through a combination of propaganda, threats, and torture over the past 25 years.

In prison, Cheng said guards force-fed him high-concentration saltwater, attached chains to his four limbs and stretched him almost to his limit, and subjected him to sessions of continuous electric shocks to his private parts, the same abuses reported by many imprisoned Falun Gong practitioners.

Also well-documented is that imprisoned Falun Gong practitioners comprise the largest source of organs feeding China’s state-run forced organ harvesting industry, according to investigations by the London-based China Tribunal.

Cheng’s Unlikely Survival

In November 2004, half way into his eight-year sentence, Cheng decided to take drastic action to protest the relentless abuse: He swallowed a blunt nail and a small rusty blade.

Prison guards immediately rushed into the room, knocked him down, and took him to the hospital. At the hospital, prison guards demanded he sign papers consenting to surgery. When he refused, six guards pinned him down and sedated him.

He regained consciousness three days later, shackled to a hospital bed with a 14-inch cut around his left chest. Cheng was then sent back to prison.

Cheng Peiming, a Falun Gong practitioner who had part of his liver and lung forcibly removed in China, shows his scar after a press conference in Washington on Aug. 9, 2024. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times

Sixteen months later, in March 2006, he was suddenly whisked to the hospital again, told he needed to undergo high-risk surgery with a high fatality rate because he'd swallowed another blade—which he hadn’t.

Cheng said he was sure they meant to kill him this time and sought to escape. He seized an opportunity when the guards fell asleep, and successfully ran away.

It turns out, this was just days before the first whistleblowers came forward to The Epoch Times, with stories about organ harvesting taking place in secret at Chinese state medical facilities. Cheng said when he heard these reports, he trembled thinking what could have happened to him.

Since escaping from China, he’s undergone multiple physical exams. Three medical experts from the United States and Taiwan confirm that a portion of his liver and lung were surgically removed.

As the first known survivor of these crimes, Cheng decided he was ready to tell his story.

Admitting More Than Intended

The widely disseminated article with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s response to Cheng’s accusations didn’t address what he suffered. Instead, it described his July press conference as taking place in a “low-ceilinged, cramped” room, it denied forced organ harvesting wholesale, calling it a “rumor” that “Western anti-China forces” have perpetuated, and it claimed that Cheng’s surgery was for removing the blade and nail.

Despite all the denials, the regime might have admitted more than intended.

Nina Shea is the director of the Center for Religious Freedom at Hudson Institute. She says the regime’s article supplied critical evidence for Cheng’s story that was previously missing.

“How did I know he was a prisoner? I didn’t know that. I didn’t have evidence of that. I don’t think he had evidence of that, but they gave evidence of it,” Shea told The Epoch Times.

Nina Shea, a senior fellow and director of the Center for Religious Freedom at the Hudson Institute, speaks at a briefing about forced organ harvesting held at the Cannon House Office Building in Washington, on Sept. 4, 2024. Alex Martin for The Epoch Times

She said the article also helped confirm that Cheng was sent to prison for his beliefs; that he was taken to the hospital; that the surgery did take place and it resulted in the scar.

More than that, the CCP has broken from its pattern of simply issuing generic, blanket denials—a sign that they consider the case serious enough to warrant a specific comment, said Robert Destro, who facilitated Cheng’s escape to the United States when he was assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights, and labor.

“I’m amazed that there’s any official narrative at all,” he told The Epoch Times.

“As we lawyers would say, that’s an admission against interest,” he said, referring to when someone makes a statement out-of-court that can be used against them as evidence.

Shea said the article shows that the Chinese authorities are “on the defensive.” It’s significant, she added, that the denials are being fronted by public security, rather than medical authorities, and that the surgery was done against his will.

“It’s almost an admission that they were involved in this,” she said. “To have this odd response, this really quite damning response … that he was in fact a prisoner, he was in fact in a hospital, he was in fact subject to surgery without his consent—it’s damning.”

As is typical in such pieces, the article carries no author’s name, nor was anyone directly quoted who would be familiar with Cheng’s case. The only source the article quotes related to Cheng is an unspecified “relevant department.”

David Matas, a Canadian human rights lawyer who has been investigating forced organ harvesting in China since 2006, said the article was no more than a “recirculation of their old propaganda.”

“There’s hardly a sentence in there that is accurate or makes any sense,” he told The Epoch Times. “There’s nothing in substance.”

David Matas, an award-winning Canadian human rights lawyer and a member of the Order of Canada and board of directors of the Toronto-based International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development, speaks during a press conference in Washington on Aug. 9, 2024. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times

He noted that the article mostly hinges upon mischaracterizing Falun Gong and maligning people who speak out. For example, Sir Geoffrey Nice, an esteemed barrister and judge who chaired the China Tribunal, and who has also investigated the human rights abuses against Uyghurs in Xinjiang, became, in the article, a “seasoned U.K. special agent” who spent his career “fabricating false accusations based on Western geopolitical goals.”

Matas called the character attack on Nice “ridiculous.”

“Realistically, the Communist Party is a lot more harmful to China than people who are telling the truth about China,” Matas said. “It’s the Communist Party that’s involved in the mass starvation, the Cultural Revolution and Tiananmen Square Massacre, in the repression of Tibet, Xinjiang, and Hong Kong.”

“The Communist Party is anti-China, and they cover up their own misdeeds by accusing others of their own faults.”

Pointless Surgery

The medical procedures Cheng went through have cast doubt on the Chinese narrative, according to Torsten Trey, director of the medical ethics group Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting.

“You can say that’s a blunt lie,” he told The Epoch Times.

When someone ingests foreign objects, doctors commonly perform an endoscopy to examine the inside of the body. It’s common in China too. A hospital in Xi'an City in central China treated around 600 patients between 2011 and 2020 to remove ingested foreign objects. Endoscopy succeeded in 99.5 percent of the cases, including some involving blades or other sharp items.

An endoscopy, in a scenario like Cheng’s, would be the first choice, said Trey.

“Why would they remove part of the lung? Why would they remove part of the liver? It doesn’t make sense,” he said.

Dr. Torsten Trey, founder and director of Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting, at an event on forced organ harvesting at Harvard University in Boston on March 7, 2024. Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times

Even if they deemed it critical to open his stomach to get the items out, he added, they would do it from the front, not from the side.

“You wouldn’t go through the lung area to get this out.”

It’s still unclear why the Chinese doctors only removed parts of Cheng’s organs during the first operation and let him live. What usually happens in China, is that organ removal is also the form of execution, which is why there’s never been a survivor to bear witness before.

Trey suggested that the hospital may have been experimenting or training the doctors in the field. They may have been exploring a different surgery technique, or doing research on organ tissues.

Wendy Rogers, a professor of clinical ethics and chair of the advisory committee for the International Coalition to End Transplant Abuse in China (ETAC), has previously said that a partial liver removal can take place when the recipient is a child.

Matas told EpochTV’s “American Thought Leaders” that all these are possible, but ultimately, “It’s really up to the Chinese government or the hospital to explain what they were doing.”

Trey, noting the timing, wondered if Chinese authorities might have caught wind of the whistleblowers’ attempt to publicize the crime and “wanted to tie up loose ends” by bringing Cheng back to the hospital to kill him.

What Happens Now?

Today, Cheng walks and speaks normally, but says he’s never been the same since his ordeal in the hospital.

“The 35-centimeter scar on my left rib cage throbs with every beat of my pulse,” he said at a press event on Sept. 3, adding that he struggles to breathe at night.

He urged the international community to pressure Beijing to open up prisons and hospitals for independent investigation from the outside world.

The organizers of the event shared a supportive message from Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R-Fla.), who said that the “heinous practice” of forced organ harvesting has long been swept “under the rug” and deserves more forceful actions from the United States.

“No person should ever be intimidated, forced from their ancestral homeland, imprisoned, or murdered because of their beliefs,” he said in the statement.

Matas estimates that the CCP could be making as much as $9 billion a year from the forced organ trade.

For former Congressman Frank Wolf, who served 34 years in Congress and two terms on the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (ending in May), the matter is horrific enough regardless of the scale.

Frank Wolf, a commissioner of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) and a former Virginia Congressman, speaks during a candlelight vigil mourning the victims of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre in Washington on June 2, 2023. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times

“If one person goes through this—Can you imagine having your brother or your mother or your father … the heart taken out, or the cornea taken out, or the kidney taken out? It’s a big business, and it has to stop,” he told The Epoch Times.

Hearing what happened to Cheng is “sickening,” says Shea. “He has been through hell and back,” she said. She added that Cheng was “fortunate that he escaped with his life,” because an unknown number of others have not.

Shea and Destro both find it heartening to see members of Congress taking steps to curb the abuse. The House, in June, passed the Falun Gong Protection Act to call for an end to the persecution of Falun Gong and levy sanctions on those complicit in forced organ harvesting. With days left in the Congressional legislative session, Destro hopes the Senate can sprint to pass it too.

“Let’s have some moral courage here and stand up,” said Destro.

Jan Jekielek contributed to this report.