Beijing’s new regulation on medical supplies for the military is part of the Chinese regime’s ongoing preparation for war, but it doesn’t necessarily mean an attack on Taiwan is imminent, experts from Taiwan’s Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) said on April 15.
On April 5, Beijing published updated regulations for medical supplies for the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) requiring the military to implement a system of medical supply reserves to maintain war preparedness.
The new regulation, which is set to take effect on June 1, prohibits the appropriation of military medical supplies for civilian use. In cases of a significant disaster, epidemic, or other emergencies, the transfer of medical supplies for civilian use will require the approval of the PLA’s central Logistic Support Department.
Shen Ming-Shih, a research fellow at INDSR and former director of the institute’s Division of National Security Research, said the new regulation is the latest in a series of moves by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to prepare for a war of attrition similar to the ongoing Russia–Ukraine war.
Managing medical supplies is “very important” in war, Shen told The Epoch Times, because the military will need large quantities of drugs, blood, antibiotics, and other medical supplies, including foreign-produced supplies.
“To avoid shortages, [the PLA] must be well-stocked before any war,” he said.
Timeline
While the CCP has never ruled Taiwan, “unification” with the self-governed island has been Beijing’s long-term goal, and the regime has never ruled out taking the island by force.Taiwanese retired Maj. Gen. Yu Tsung-chi previously told The Epoch Times that while the arrests of Xi’s “staunchest supporters in the army” do indicate signs of his power being weakened, there is the possibility that the apparent purges are smoke and mirrors that cover up preparations for a real attack on Taiwan.
Hung Tzu-Chieh, an associate research fellow and deputy director at INDSR’s Division of Chinese Politics, Military, and Warfighting Concepts, said the PLA has been preparing for war, including by conducting drills in the Taiwan Strait and regulating its medical supplies; still, he said, it doesn’t appear to be ready for an invasion of Taiwan this year.
“Xi Jinping puts lots of emphasis on strengthening the PLA’s warfighting capabilities, but the focus is not entirely on Taiwan,” he told The Epoch Times, noting that Xi also needs a stronger PLA to maintain power and to help promote the CCP’s “dream of a strong country and strong military.”
Hung said he doesn’t believe that the PLA is ready because of the dissolution of its Strategic Support Force (SSF) in 2024.
In April 2024, the PLA split the SSF into Aerospace, Cyberspace, and Information Support forces.
Hung said the PLA would need time before the new forces could run well.
In March, Beijing stated that it was ready to fight a “trade war or any type of war” that the United States wants after the Trump administration began increasing tariffs on imports from China, prompting speculation about the CCP’s plans.
Wang said this is not a good time for the PLA to attack Taiwan because it would be defeated by Washington.
If pressure from the Trump administration made the CCP launch an attack on Taiwan, Beijing could “fall right into an American trap,” she said.
She said it’s important to keep watching PLA leaders who don’t believe that now is the time to attack Taiwan.
Protracted War
To prepare for a Chinese invasion or blockade, Taiwan’s military has been practicing its rapid response capabilities, which might enable an apparent Chinese drill around the island to turn into a blitzkrieg.In October 2024, Taipei announced plans to maintain Taiwan’s food supply if a Chinese blockade cut off shipping to the island.
Shen said the chance of a quick siege seems low because the Russia–Ukraine war showed that troop movements can be detected by intelligence forces.
It’s “increasingly likely” that an attack on Taiwan would turn into a “protracted war,” he said.
“That’s why the CCP set up a provincial office of defense mobilization, increased its gold reserve, and [allegedly] banned high-ranking officials from holding overseas assets to avoid the impact of sanctions,” Shen said.
Su Tzu-yun, a research fellow at INDSR and director of the institute’s Division of Defense Strategy and Resources, previously told The Epoch Times that a blockade would also be risky to the CCP. A long-term blockade would likely provoke intervention because “no country would tolerate” a blockade of one of the world’s busiest shipping routes, he said.