The federal health agency started recommending the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine booster doses made by Pfizer and Moderna several weeks ago. They’re designed to combat Omicron sub-variants BA.4 and BA.5.
Because the CDC data don’t include individuals who received the updated COVID-19 boosters in Idaho and Texas, the White House told The Associated Press that it believes that about 5 million doses of the new vaccine boosters have been administered.
The old boosters will no longer be available. The primary series of the vaccines will remain the same, or based on the original Wuhan COVID-19 strain. The updated boosters contain components of the spike protein from the BA.4 and BA.5 Omicron subvariants. BA.5 is the dominant strain in the United States at present.
In signing off on the new vaccine boosters on Sept. 1, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky recommended the vaccine boosters, saying that they’re “formulated to better protect against the most recently circulating COVID-19 variant.”
“They can help restore protection that has waned since previous vaccination and were designed to provide broader protection against newer variants,” her statement read. “This recommendation followed a comprehensive scientific evaluation and robust scientific discussion. If you are eligible, there is no bad time to get your COVID-19 booster and I strongly encourage you to receive it.”
But during a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices several weeks ago, its members noted a lack of human data for the bivalent boosters.
“I really do struggle with a vaccine that has no clinical data that has been reported for humans,” Dr. Oliver Brooks, one of the advisory committee members, said in the meeting.
Data that were presented by Pfizer and Moderna dealt with a human trial that tested a different formulation, a bivalent with components of the original virus strain and the BA.1 strain.
Dr. Melinda Wharton, the panel’s executive secretary and a CDC official, urged members to think about how influenza vaccines are updated each year without clinical data, and other members said they appreciated the comparison.