Democratic leadership referred Assembly Constitutional Amendment (ACA) 10—introduced by Assemblyman Matt Haney (D-San Francisco)—to the Assembly’s Housing and Community Development Committee, where it’s expected to receive its first public hearing. No date had been set for the hearing as of May 1.
According to a coalition of housing activist organizations, if the constitutional amendment is passed by the Legislature and voters, it would establish a government obligation to protect the right to housing by shielding it from third-party threats and fulfill the right to housing by enacting policies and providing state funds to ensure that all Californians have secure housing.
The groups say enshrining a fundamental right to housing in the California Constitution is a necessary step to address the growing housing crisis.
Under international law, upon which the proposed amendment is structured, housing must be “adequate,” according to the report. This means ensuring the housing is permanent, affordable, safe, healthy, and accessible to grocery stores, jobs, and schools. It needs to also “respect and take into account the expression of cultural identity,” the groups said in the report.
More than half of the nation’s homeless live in California, while the state’s population is only 12 percent of the nation’s, according to the report.
Skyrocketing housing costs, lack of affordable housing, and stagnating wages are largely to blame, the report stated.
Advocates and Critics
Families and affordable housing advocates gathered at the state Capitol on April 24 to show support for ACA 10 and another housing initiative, Senate Bill 567, by state Sen. Maria Elena Durazo (D-Los Angeles), which would put restrictions on residential rent increases and prohibit landlords from evicting tenants without a specific legal justification.ACCE representative Alicia Baltazar, a disabled single mother from Wilmington, attended the rally and said she supports ACA 10. She and her young son were homeless and living in a shelter before qualifying for Section 8 housing, a federal voucher program that helps low-income families pay for housing.
“Every day, I live in constant fear of losing Section 8 and of renter discrimination because people don’t want to rent to people who don’t have jobs,” Baltazar said. “People don’t want to rent to people who have children. People don’t want to rent to people who are our color, who are undocumented, and things like that.”
However, not everyone is sold on the idea of creating a right to housing.
“Elected officials feel that if they vote for something, therefore it is,” Righeimer said. “There’s no such thing as affordable housing. All there is is subsidized housing. It’s really just a matter of who’s going to subsidize it. The 2-by-4s and concrete still cost money.”