Drivers in California might be allowed to drive whatever speed they like in lanes on two major highways in the near future if a new bill proposed last month becomes law.
Republican State Sen. John M.W. Moorlach, who authored the bill, named it “the high-speed road,” after the state’s high-speed rail project.
I-5 and SR 99, which connect several major cities in Northern and Southern California, are key components of California’s highway system. By adding two lanes to each, Moorlach suggests that would help reduce road deterioration and traffic congestion caused by the state’s growing population.
In addition, he said driving with no speed limit might not be as dangerous as it seems.
“The BASt Federal Highway Research Institute delved deeper into accidents in Germany, finding injured accident rates (per million vehicle km) on autobahns is 0.09, compared to 0.22 on national and rural roads. The fatality rate (per billion vehicle km) is 1.7 on autobahns, and 6.3 on national and rural roads,” he continued.
The exact cost of the project is still unclear, but the author’s estimation is around $3.3 billion for the four new lanes from Grapevine to Sacramento.
The high-speed road project would be funded by revenue from the state’s cap-and-trade program and likely would be cheaper than the high-speed rail, according to the author.
The high-speed rail project, which started in 2008 and was expected to be completed in 2033, has been plagued by serious delays and financial issues.
The project originally planned to connect San Francisco and Los Angeles with a travel time of 2 hours and 40 minutes. However, because of speed restrictions, certain design requirements, and cost concerns, a subsequent report had an estimate of 3.5 to 4 hours of total travel time.
Gov. Gavin Newsom has suggested shrinking the scope of the project and said during his State of the State speech on Feb. 12 that it’s too expensive, slow, and opaque.
One week after Newsom’s speech, the U.S. Department of Transportation canceled a $929 million grant to the project and began “actively exploring every legal option” for the return of $2.5 billion it’s already allocated to the project.
“If Sacramento is serious about allowing Californians to travel between Los Angeles and the Bay Area, and high-speed rail will take too long to build, let’s construct four additional lanes with no maximum speed limit to provide for high speed on a safe road,” Moorlach said.