California Community Colleges Consider Diversity Quotas in Hiring, Tenure Review

California Community Colleges Consider Diversity Quotas in Hiring, Tenure Review
Orange Coast College campus, in Costa Mesa, Calif., on October 04, 2020. John Fredricks/The Epoch Times
Updated:

The governing board that oversees the California Community Colleges (CCC) considered March 21 including diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) in the employee evaluation and tenure review process amid enrollment decline, and some have expressed concern, calling it a “divisive measure.”

The proposal (pdf) was introduced as part of the enrollment management strategy by Deputy Chancellor Daisy Gonzalez and Vice Chancellor Marty Alvarado, with an aim to advance student equitable outcomes by requiring the faculties to employ teachings that reflect “DEIA and anti-racist principles, and in particular respect for, and acknowledgment, of the diverse backgrounds of students,” according to the proposal.

“We can’t get to improve student outcomes, equitable student outcomes, eliminating achievement gaps and or addressing the issues that have come to this board previously in terms of the number of students that we lose every term until we get to really thinking about what happens in the classroom and the critical role that plays in our student retention and enrollment policies,” Alvarado said to the board.

The proposal requires the Chancellor to establish guidance describing DEIA competencies and criteria for all employees for evaluation and use it as “minimum standards” in all districts.

In addition to faculty, the criteria would also require the administrators and staff members to promote DEIA and anti-racist principles and acknowledge the diversity of students of colleagues.

This regulatory action was questioned by multiple parties such as Californians for Equal Rights Foundation, a non-partisan and non-profit organization that seeks equal rights in public education.

“By marrying DEIA with anti-racism, CCC has fully subscribed to all major tenets of critical race theory,” read a statement issued by the foundation following the meeting. “The proposed changes are illiberal and toxic, serving only to further inflame racial divisions and cover up real problems in our education system.”

Additionally, the foundation said the action also pushes higher education toward ideological indoctrination and thought conformity through creating a “uniform understanding of how to evaluate” for all employees.

The presidents of the Community College Association of the California Teachers Association, the Community College Council of the California Federation of Teachers, and the California Community College Independents also expressed their concern in a letter (pdf) asking the board to make changes in the proposal.

They said that imposing the criteria solely identified by the Chancellor will deprive the collective bargaining right, adding that local involvement is essential to the formation of the evaluation criteria.

“Collectively bargaining evaluation criteria is not only required by law; it is also the best way to ensure that evaluations have the desired impact,” the letter reads.

The CCC governing board will further discuss the proposal at a future meeting.

A spokesperson for CCC did not respond to a request for comment by press deadline.