Legislation to expand rent control and allow local jurisdictions to limit the amount that residential landlords can raise rent each year was rejected by the California Senate on May 30.
“The first vote didn’t garner sufficient votes to pass so the senator opted to make it a two-year bill,” spokeswoman Alicia Lawrence said. “We’re continuing to work on the bill.”
If passed, Wahab’s bill would have allowed cities to impose rent control measures on newer residential properties, but it wouldn’t mandate rent control in any local jurisdiction, according to a bill analysis.
The exemptions cover single-family homes, condominiums, or residential properties built after 1995 or after the passage of a local rent control ordinance, whichever is earlier.
Wahab argued in a bill analysis that the rental housing act “undermines local efforts to address rent gouging and displacement of millions of California renters across the state.”
Her bill would be applicable to any dwelling or unit that was issued a certificate of occupancy within the past 28 years, which means that what qualifies as new housing for rent control would be automatically updated and expanded with the passage of time, according to a bill analysis.
Tenants Together, an affordable-housing advocacy group in California, supported the legislation.
Opposition From Property Owners’ Groups
The Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles, the largest statewide rental housing trade organization in the United States, along with 24 other organizations and individuals, was glad to hear of the bill’s demise.“That died today, so we’re very excited about that,” Dan Yukelson, executive director of the association, told The Epoch Times on May 30.
The association asserted in a bill analysis that several studies demonstrate the disastrous effect that rent control has on new construction.
Also, 71 percent of housing providers say rent control negatively impacts development or investment plans in major U.S. cities, according to the National Apartment Association of America (NAA).
“Housing providers absorb the cost of essential maintenance and reduce investments in improvements and nonessential work due to rent control,” researchers wrote.
More than half of the respondents in the study said they expect to sell properties as a result.
Researchers interviewed housing providers and developers in Santa Ana and Santa Barbara, California; St. Paul, Minnesota; and Portland and Eugene, Oregon.
According to a position statement by the NAA, rent control policies hurt communities by limiting accessibility and affordability.
Currently, 33 states have laws prohibiting local jurisdictions from adopting rent control laws whereas California, Washington, D.C., Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, and Oregon have rent control policies at the state or local level, according to the NAA.
This is the third attempt by the organization to repeal the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act. Two prior initiatives in 2018 and 2020 were rejected by voters.