There has been no shortage of debate in recent years around how California’s history should be portrayed and remembered. As historian Bill George notes, a number of changes have been made to remove historical statues and rename schools that have long borne the names of pioneering figures. However, George argues we must take a more nuanced look at history before making such sweeping alterations.
Bill George, a historian, author, and filmmaker, delves into the significant transformations occurring at the California State Capitol, highlighting the broader implications of these changes on the state’s history and cultural legacy. He criticizes the extensive remodeling project of the California State Capitol, which includes constructing a legislators-only parking lot and removing a traditional protest area. He questions the prioritization of such a costly project over other pressing needs.
George questions the removal of statues honoring Christopher Columbus and Father Junipero Serra from the state Capitol grounds. While their actions can rightly be criticized by modern standards, George says, we must consider the complex cultural and historical context of their time. Both played integral roles in establishing Spanish settlements in Alta California. A fuller discussion of their legacies is merited before eliminating long-standing monuments.
George also cautions against the trend of “presentism,” or judging historical figures solely through a modern lens. What was acceptable or necessary in the past may not be so today. When renaming schools previously named for explorers like Kit Carson or pioneer John Sutter, their accomplishments in opening up the American West should not be ignored or distorted simply because some actions are now seen as harmful to Native Americans.
Rather than focus on symbolic name changes, George argues, reform efforts would be better spent on improving lackluster education outcomes in California’s schools. Many students struggle to read or perform math at grade level. Addressing these pressing issues should take priority over historical reinterpretations that remove important figures from our shared heritage without public consensus.
Overall, gaining a balanced understanding of history requires considering all perspectives, not just those of today. A more open process that incorporates diverse viewpoints could help ensure any changes to California’s historical monuments and place names have broad community support and preserve an accurate account of the past.
