Grocery shoppers in the United States have an abundance of options to choose from, and a wide range of prices accompanying varying selections.
Items labeled as organic typically sell for a premium over nonorganic counterparts, but many consumers are unaware of the market forces that factor into the pricing.
While all farms face certain regulatory hurdles at the federal, state, and local levels, organic producers are saddled with more comprehensive rules to abide by.
Nonorganic farms do not have such overhead costs and thus have fewer expenses priced into the cost of goods sold.
Throughout the growing seasons, organic farms cost more to operate for a variety of reasons, and subsidies that disproportionately benefit chemically intensive agriculture exacerbate the price discrepancies, according to advocates for the organic industry.
About 2 percent of the money allocated for research by the federal government since 2018 has been focused on organic food production, according to data collected by the Organic Trade Association.
“We would really like to see more of a balance for the research money, especially because funds used for organic studies tend to benefit the entire Ag industry,” a spokesperson for the trade group told The Epoch Times.
For example, past research related to integrated pest management—in which beneficial insects are used to manage invasive pests—was initiated by organic producers, but the subsequent findings are now widely used.
With the bulk of federal dollars going to study nonorganic practices such as how to use pesticides and herbicides banned in organic production, critics of the current system suggest that the playing field is tilted toward farmers who use a wide range of chemicals.
It has resulted in significantly lower prices for some nonorganic foods, including heavily processed fast foods, compared with organic, natural ingredients.
More Expensive Inputs
Fertilizers used in organic production—including manure, alfalfa meal, and composted material, among other things—are more costly than synthetic versions such as urea and ammonium nitrate. Organic nutrients are estimated to cost 20 percent to 50 percent more than synthetic fertilizers.Conventional farms rely on synthetic materials developed since the invention of chemically intensive agriculture in the 1950s.
Organic farmers use crop rotation and cover crops to fix nitrogen in the soil, a method that builds soil health, improves water retention, outcompetes weeds, and reduces insect populations.
More Labor-Intensive
Removing weeds is one of the costliest aspects of organic agriculture, as mechanical removal using string trimmers or flamethrowers is the preferred method and requires many hours of labor to eradicate nuisance plants.“During part of the year, we spend more hours removing weeds than doing anything else,” Juan Guzman, a managing farmhand for organic vineyards in Northern California, told The Epoch Times.
“It’s the most important job because the weeds will steal food from the vines and reduce the yields if we don’t get rid of them.”
Supply and Demand
Also affecting pricing are the perennial forces of supply and demand. Health-conscious consumers are seeking high-quality foods at increasing levels, but production has plateaued in recent years and organic yields are slightly lower than those of conventional crops.A thin market, with fewer producers than in the conventional sector, creates a situation in which more dollars are chasing fewer goods, thus leading to higher pricing strategies at retail levels.
Imports of organic produce are increasing to meet the demand, with more than $4 billion of goods imported in 2023, according to the Department of Agriculture.
Consumers Want Healthy, Affordable Food
Demand for organic food is at an all-time high, with approximately $64 billion worth of certified organic food sold in the United States in 2024, up from about $11 billion in 2000, according to the Agriculture Department’s 2025 situation report.Families of all backgrounds across the United States are prioritizing healthy living, and a growing movement is popularizing a return to traditional farming methods that avoid synthetic chemicals.
“I don’t want that going into my child’s body,” Megan Armstrong, a resident of Huntsville, Texas, and mother of a 3-year-old, told The Epoch Times.
“It’s worth the extra bucks to keep my child safe.”
Another mother from Texas, Kelsey Facundo, said she prioritizes organic food for her children, while she and her husband oftentimes have to make do with what they can afford.
A homesteading mother said the difference in quality between organic and conventional meats is stark.
Animals raised for organic production are fed certified organic hay and grains, allowed to graze in pastures, and strictly barred from eating genetically modified grains, which is the standard fare for conventional livestock production.
“I started finding local butchers to buy all my meat from,” Shanna Dixon told The Epoch Times.
“It’s worth the price because the taste is on another level, which really goes to show you what they are doing to the meat between the slaughter and the table to change the taste.”
Newly appointed Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has long championed organic agriculture as part of his “Make America Healthy Again” agenda, and many advocates are anxiously watching his actions to see how new policies could affect the industry.
“Nothing is going to be off-limits,” he said during introductory remarks to his department on Feb. 18, referring to prospective reviews of the U.S. food supply.