Union Pacific and rail union members are suing each other in court over how the company should implement a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for its 31,000 employees.
Union Pacific’s unions argue that the railroad giant needed to first negotiate with them before it announced earlier this month it would require all its workers to get the vaccine. In a lawsuit of its own, filed last week, Union Pacific said that it has the authority to mandate the shots.
The railroad said that it would mandate all its workers to get the vaccine by Dec. 8 to comply with President Joe Biden’s Sept. 9 announcement requiring all federal contractors to get the vaccine. Meanwhile, it is simultaneously offering $300 bonuses if employees get the vaccine.
Union Pacific filed its lawsuit against the unions in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on Friday to prevent them from going on strike or taking other actions to affect the company’s operations.
The railroad, in the suit, said that it has an “implied right to set fitness for duty standards includes the right to require employees to comply with the requirements” of the mandate. “Union Pacific’s position is supported by decades of past practice, and is, at a minimum, not frivolous or obviously insubstantial,” it said.
It came as the Transportation Division of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers (SMART-TD) filed a suit in the Illinois court.
The union contends that federal law prohibits railroads from changing their rates of pay and working conditions during negotiations with unions. It said that contract discussions have been ongoing between the unions and Union Pacific since November 2019.
“Over the past two weeks, the Union Pacific Railroad seems to have forgotten that it is not Walmart. The railroad has unilaterally changed pay provisions for vaccinated employees who experience a breakthrough COVID infection due to workplace exposure,” they stated.