Trump on Biden Administration’s EV Policies: Developed ‘By Very, Very Stupid People’

President Donald Trump and White House trade adviser Peter Navarro check out the new Endurance all-electric pickup truck on the south lawn of the White House in Washington, on Sept. 28, 2020. Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

The transition toward electric vehicles (EVs) has become a polarizing issue in the United States, with former President Donald Trump vocalizing strong opinions against the rapid move to electrification under President Joe Biden’s administration.

This discourse is set against the backdrop of the 2024 presidential election, where the former president, having solidified his position as the presumptive Republican nominee, critiqued the Biden administration’s EV policies during a CNBC interview earlier this week.

When asked about his relationship with Elon Musk, who owns social media site X as well as Tesla, Mr. Trump said he was unsure of any upcoming endorsement or financial benefit to his campaign by the billionaire CEO, but noted they had disagreements on electric vehicles.

“Look, I’ve been friendly with him over the years,” Mr. Trump said in the CNBC segment. “We obviously have opposing views on a minor subject called electric cars. I’m all for electric cars, but you have to have all of the alternatives also.”

Trump’s Perspective on Electric Vehicles

Mr. Trump has made it clear that he appreciates the concept of electric vehicles, but insists that the United States is not yet ready for a full transition.

Mr. Trump said it is impossible for the United States to transition to a fully electric automotive market.

In the CNBC interview, he outlined several challenges he sees with EVs, including limited range, high costs, and a significant portion of manufacturing taking place in China.

Mr. Trump argues that these factors make EVs impractical for widespread adoption at this time. Moreover, he has previously labeled EVs as a “hoax” and suggested that an all-electric mandate could potentially harm the U.S. auto industry and lead to job losses.

“And you know, the electric cars are … it’s not even a possibility to go all electric,” he said. “This Biden all-electric mandate is by very, very stupid people. First of all, they don’t go far. They cost too much and they’re all gonna be made in China,” adding he believed the auto workers would support his candidacy over President Biden’s for that reason.

Mr. Trump’s critique extends beyond the vehicles themselves to the infrastructure required to support a fully electric future.

He expressed concerns over the adequacy of the U.S. electric grid and the distribution networks necessary to support widespread EV adoption, suggesting that the current infrastructure is not prepared for such a transition.

“I mean, you have a grid system in this country that’s obsolete and a disaster,” he said. “It’s one of the things we worked on a lot is our grid system. It can’t produce the electricity, it can’t distribute the electricity.

Auto Industry’s Response and Challenges

The automotive sector is at a crossroads, with major manufacturers recognizing the need to address infrastructure challenges to facilitate the transition to electric vehicles.

Collaborations with Tesla and other initiatives aimed at expanding charging networks are examples of the industry’s efforts to overcome these hurdles. However, the potential rollback of federal support under a hypothetical Trump administration poses the risk of a major U-turn to these initiatives.

The Inflation Reduction Act’s federal EV tax credits and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law’s allocation of $7.5 billion for building an EV charger network are critical components of the current strategy to encourage EV adoption. Mr. Trump’s promise to reverse these policies could stymie progress toward electrification.

Consumer sentiment is another factor influencing the auto industry’s approach. The high cost of electric vehicles compared to their gas-powered and hybrid counterparts has led to stagnating sales, with companies like Ford, GM, and Tesla warning of continued slumping demand. This situation has prompted automakers to explore alternatives, including hybrids, to meet consumer needs and preferences.

Diverse Strategies for a Future in Flux

Automakers are preparing for various election outcomes, recognizing the need for flexibility in their product lines.

Stellantis, for example, is developing “multi-energy platforms” that can accommodate both electric and traditional gas-powered options, according to Yahoo Finance. This strategy allows for adaptation to changing political and consumer landscapes, exemplified by the upcoming Dodge Charger, which will offer two powertrain options.

Tesla’s position in this debate is unique, given its focus solely on electric vehicles. Mr. Musk’s relationship with Mr. Trump has been noted, with Mr. Trump expressing a degree of fondness for Mr. Musk. Yet, the future of federal support for EVs, crucial for Tesla’s business model, remains uncertain as the election approaches.

The debate over the transition to electric vehicles in the United States underscores a broader discussion about the future of transportation, energy, and environmental policy.

With the 2024 presidential election on the horizon, the contrasting visions of Mr. Trump and President Biden highlight the political, economic, and infrastructural challenges of adopting a fully electric vehicle fleet.

The automotive industry’s response, consumer attitudes, and the outcome of the election will all play critical roles in shaping the path forward for electric vehicles in the United States.