Elon Musk filed a lawsuit against Microsoft-backed OpenAI to prevent the nonprofit entity transitioning to a for-profit enterprise, claiming this contradicts his agreement with the company.
“To ensure safety remained the primary focus, Altman also promised that the technology developed by the nonprofit would be owned by it. Based on these commitments, Musk agreed to co-found and fund OpenAI, lending his name and credibility to help attract the talented AI scientists necessary to make OpenAI a success,” the lawsuit states.
Altman and Brockman later proposed turning OpenAI into a for-profit entity. In September 2017, Musk clarified he would stop donations if the change was made. Altman and Brockman subsequently made a “firm commitment” that OpenAI would remain a nonprofit, said the suit. Based on these assurances, Musk then invested an additional $10.27 million.
The complaint accused Microsoft and Altman of siphoning off the nonprofit’s staff and intellectual property to for-profit entities that Altman launched in which Microsoft secured a “massive stake.”
In November 2023, OpenAI’s board of directors fired Altman from his position after becoming aware of “numerous conflicts of interests and deceptions.”
However, Microsoft used its influence in the company to force board members to reinstate Altman and made them resign from their posts, the lawsuit claimed. Microsoft eventually got access to all of OpenAI’s proprietary information, it said.
The complaint claims that OpenAI and Microsoft prohibit investors from funding OpenAI’s competitors, “specifically naming” Musk’s artificial intelligence company, xAI.
Microsoft and OpenAI now control almost 70 percent of the generative AI market while engaging in “anticompetitive conduct.” The lawsuit said OpenAI is now looking to convert to a for-profit entity, which would be the “final death knell” to the repeated commitments it made to Musk and the public.
“OpenAI and Microsoft together exploiting Musk’s donations so they can build a for-profit monopoly, one now specifically targeting xAI, is just too much,” the complaint said.
“OpenAI’s path from a nonprofit to for-profit behemoth is replete with per se anticompetitive practices, flagrant breaches of its charitable mission, and rampant self-dealing. Allowing this course of conduct to continue until final disposition will seriously harm plaintiffs and the public at large.”
The lawsuit asked the court for a preliminary injunction “to preserve what is left of OpenAI’s nonprofit character.”
OpenAI Stance
On its website, OpenAI said it launched with the aim of collecting $1 billion in donations, but was only able to raise roughly $130 million.After it became “increasingly clear” that the company could not move forward with donations alone, it decided to create a new for-profit subsidiary that would run at the direction of the OpenAI nonprofit parent company.
While the for-profit entity can raise capital from investors, it is “legally bound to pursue the Nonprofit’s mission, and carry out that mission by engaging in research, development, commercialization and other core operations,” the company claims.
“Throughout, OpenAI’s guiding principles of safety and broad benefit would be central to its approach.”
In accordance with the law for nonprofits, no directors on the board of the OpenAI nonprofit have any equity in OpenAI, the company notes. Altman’s “only interest is indirectly through a Y Combinator investment fund that made a small investment in OpenAI before he was full-time.”
The profits made by the for-profit subsidiary disbursed to employees and investors, including Microsoft, is capped, the company says.
“All residual value created above and beyond the cap will be returned to the Nonprofit for the benefit of humanity,” it states.
Preventing Absolute Control Over OpenAI
This isn’t the first time that Musk has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI. In February, for example, he sued the company, with the complaint later dropped without explanation in June, only to be subsequently revived in August.The lawsuit had made similar allegations about Altman’s violation of keeping OpenAI a nonprofit. It also alleged breach of contract, fraud, and violation of federal civil racketeering laws.
“In late 2017, we and Elon decided the next step for the mission was to create a for-profit entity. Elon wanted majority equity, initial board control, and to be CEO. In the middle of these discussions, he withheld funding,” the nonprofit said.
“We couldn’t agree to terms on a for-profit with Elon because we felt it was against the mission for any individual to have absolute control over OpenAI. Elon soon chose to leave OpenAI, saying that our probability of success was zero, and that he planned to build an AGI [artificial general intelligenc] competitor within Tesla.”
Musk also intends to build a supercomputer to support xAI’s development, which is expected to become operational by next fall.