Officials shared concerns about the possible effects of the new administration’s economic agenda, particularly tariffs, deregulation, and taxes.
They also say that adjustments to immigration policy could derail the institution’s disinflation process.
“Participants observed that the committee was well positioned to take time to assess the evolving outlook for economic activity, the labor market, and inflation, with the vast majority pointing to a still-restrictive policy stance,” the document reads.
“Participants indicated that provided the economy remained near maximum employment, they would want to see further progress on inflation before making additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate.”
Still, they noted that monetary policy decision-making was not on a preset course and that actions would be dependent on changes in the economy, outlook, and balance of risks.
Fed officials believe that policy could remain restrictive—a position that neither stimulates nor restricts economic growth—because of the economy’s strength.
At last month’s policy meeting, the Fed left interest rates unchanged for the first time since officials launched their easing cycle in September 2024. Policymakers agreed to keep the benchmark federal funds rate unchanged at between 4.25 percent and 4.5 percent.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has indicated that he and his colleagues are not in a hurry to lower interest rates until there is progress on inflation.
“We know that reducing policy restraint too fast or too much could hinder progress on inflation. At the same time, reducing policy restraint too slowly or too little could unduly weaken economic activity and employment.”
Fed Officials: Patience, Please
A chorus of senior Fed officials have expressed the same sentiment as Powell: The central bank can afford to be patient as the economy continues to grow and the labor market remains solid.While policymakers assess various scenarios, Dallas Federal Reserve President Lorie Logan said that “we’ll need to hold rates at least at the current level for quite some time.”
She noted that even if the Fed observes inflation returning close to the institution’s 2 percent target in the coming months, it might not be enough to “allow the FOMC to cut rates soon.”
“The monetary policy implications of these uncertainties generally come down to whether sustainably restoring price stability requires keeping rates at least at the current level or moving lower.”
“It’s really appropriate for policy to be patient, careful, and there’s no urgency for making additional adjustments, especially given all of the uncertainty,” Collins said.
“If we see inflation rising or progress stalling in 2025, the Fed will be in the difficult position of trying to figure out if the inflation is coming from overheating or if it’s coming from tariffs,” Goolsbee said. “That distinction will be critical for deciding when or even if the Fed should act.”
The Federal Reserve’s next two-day policy meeting will occur on March 18 and March 19.