Federal Reserve officials fear that elevated inflation could be more persistent than expected, a summary of its March policy meeting reveals.
Participants at the joint meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on March 18–19 alluded to higher core goods inflation that could reflect “the anticipation of higher tariffs.”
Ultimately, nearly all meeting participants viewed upside risks to inflation and downside risks to employment.
The headline annual inflation rate is forecast to slow to 2 percent by 2027.
The document stated that as the U.S. central bank monitors the “net effect” of government policy changes, officials acknowledged that a more “cautious approach” to monetary policy would make sense.
Fed staff projected that real gross domestic product growth was weaker than estimates at the January meeting, noting that “incoming data for aggregate spending were below expectations and the support from financial conditions had lessened.”
The meeting summary comes shortly after President Donald Trump announced a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs and a higher 125 percent levy on China.
“The Minutes were heavily focused on effects of higher tariffs, referenced eighteen times as policy makers warned of uncertainty around the magnitude and persistence of such effects,” Jeffrey Roach, chief economist for LPL Financial, wrote in an email to The Epoch Times.
Fed Talks
In recent weeks, an increasing number of monetary policymakers have expressed concern about the president’s tariff plans.Officials had been coy at the beginning of the new administration, stating that they would seek greater clarity before making policy decisions. However, many warn about upside risks to inflation and economic growth stemming from higher levies.
Powell said that although tariffs could result in a one-time price adjustment, the central bank’s job is to ensure it “does not become an ongoing inflation problem.”
Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari said that he and his colleagues need to leave monetary policy alone and refrain from cutting interest rates.
“Given the paramount importance of keeping long-run inflation expectations anchored and the likely boost to near-term inflation from tariffs, the bar for cutting rates even in the face of a weakening economy and potentially increased unemployment is higher.”
In a speech at the University of Pittsburgh, Lisa Cook, a governor on the Federal Reserve Board, stated that the recent developments would support maintaining a restrictive policy stance to prevent revived cost pressures and the risk of unanchored inflation expectations.

Ultimately, uncertainty and risks to the dual mandate should force the Fed to keep the policy rate unchanged.
Core inflation, which omits volatile energy and food prices, is expected to slow to 3 percent from 3.1 percent.
Although the Fed held a closed-door meeting this week, LPL Financial’s Lawrence Gillum says there have been zero signals that the Fed will intervene in the market turmoil.
“There’s been no indication the Fed is set to intervene, but one of its key mandates is financial stability, and with bond markets essentially in free fall, we’re sure the recent price action has caught the Fed’s attention,” Gillum, the firm’s chief fixed income strategist, said in an email to The Epoch Times.
Trump has returned to requesting that the Fed cut interest rates now that inflation pressures have diminished and the U.S. economy begins its tariff-driven transition.