ExxonMobil has taken preliminary steps to sue the Russian Federation after Russian President Vladimir Putin intervened to block the energy company’s exit from the country.
The Sakhalin-1 project, of which ExxonMobil is the principal operator, produced more than 200,000 barrels of crude oil daily last year, and the project includes the world’s longest oil well, the Z-44 Chayvo Well. Despite the lucrative yields and high sunk costs of the Sakhalin-1 project, the company’s continued involvement with Russia constitutes a challenge for the company’s public relations in the West, as well as a humanitarian concern for the fossil fuel giant.
“In response to recent events, we are beginning the process to discontinue operations and developing steps to exit the Sakhalin-1 venture. ... Given the current situation, ExxonMobil will not invest in new developments in Russia.”
However, the efficacy of the lawsuit remains an open question to some analysts observing the situation. Geopolitical consultant Matthew Easton expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of ExxonMobil’s ultimatum, arguing that the lawsuit would only be efficacious under conditions that ExxonMobil had no incentive not to operate within Russia.
“The lawsuit is a bit of a Catch-22,” Easton told The Epoch Times. "As long as sanctions are in place, Russia has no incentive to play nice with ExxonMobil. If the sanctions were to go away, Russia would have to deal with Exxon more diplomatically.
“However, if the sanctions went away, Exxon wouldn’t be seeking to pull out of the current deal, and there would be no need for a lawsuit.”
ExxonMobil is far from the first Western company to seek to exit a joint venture with the Russian government following the country’s invasion of Ukraine in February. For example, the Norwegian state-owned energy company Equinor took preliminary steps in February to exit its joint ventures with the Russian government, a process that the company completed by May.