Federal Reserve officials have been coy about when they will agree to cut interest rates.
The financial markets expect the U.S. central bank to pull the trigger on the first rate cut at the September policy meeting. But one monetary policymaker thinks the precise timing of when the institution will pivot doesn’t matter a whole lot.
Fed Gov. Christopher Waller, in comments at an event by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City on July 17, said that whether the monetary authorities pivot in September or December “doesn’t matter” from a macroeconomic perspective unless there is an enormous shock to the U.S. economy in the next few months, which, he noted, is unlikely.
Mr. Waller said changes to the policy rate come with a long and variable lag, meaning that the effects of a reduction wouldn’t be observed in the broader economy for a while.
“There’s a lot of rational attention by the markets on what meeting it’s going to be,” he said. “But as a policymaker, our job is not to try to say whether it should or shouldn’t be one meeting or another.”
Achieving the Fed’s dual mandate—price stability and maximum employment—is what matters, according to Mr. Waller.
“It’s not a particular meeting. It’s when do we think the conditions are right to go, and that’s it,” he said.
Based on recent inflation data, Mr. Waller is confident that the Fed is inching closer to achieving its objective of returning inflation to its 2 percent target. That means that the central bank is inching closer to the time when a cut to the benchmark federal funds rate is warranted, he said.
“While I don’t believe we’ve reached our final destination, I do believe we are getting closer to the time when a cut in the policy rate is warranted,” he said in prepared remarks.
Monetary Policy Lags
Citing the work of eminent economist Milton Friedman in the 1950s and 1960s, Fed economists have iterated the lag between monetary policy actions and their intended economic effects.However, modern economists have debated the length of time it can take to observe the effects of monetary policy adjustments in the wider economy.
Like his colleagues, he’s pleased by some of the data that would support the case for a rate reduction.
“I have been very encouraged both by the last couple months of non-housing services and by what might be the start on the housing side,” Mr. Barkin said. “I'd like to see that continue.”
The prevalence and frequency of economic indicators may offer insights into how Fed policy influences inflation, the labor market, and the broader economy. Money supply data and the Fed’s balance sheet are also published weekly for market watchers to comb through.
The next two-day FOMC policy meeting will take place on July 30–31.